CVE-2017-15090 (GCVE-0-2017-15090)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-01-23 15:00
Modified
2024-09-16 18:38
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:50:14.915Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
},
{
"name": "101982",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "PowerDNS",
"vendor": "PowerDNS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-11-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-01-24T10:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
},
{
"name": "101982",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-11-27T00:00:00",
"ID": "CVE-2017-15090",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "PowerDNS",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "PowerDNS"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-347"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
},
{
"name": "101982",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-15090",
"datePublished": "2018-01-23T15:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-10-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T18:38:21.212Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…