CVE-2017-12197 (GCVE-0-2017-12197)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-01-18 21:00
Modified
2024-08-05 18:28
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
It was found that libpam4j up to and including 1.8 did not properly validate user accounts when authenticating. A user with a valid password for a disabled account would be able to bypass security restrictions and possibly access sensitive information.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat, Inc. | libpam4j |
Version: up to and including 1.8 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:28:16.597Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171107 [SECURITY] [DLA 1165-1] libpam4j security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00008.html"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:2904",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2904"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:2905",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2905"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:2906",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2906"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4025",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4025"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503103"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "libpam4j",
"vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "up to and including 1.8"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2018-01-16T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "It was found that libpam4j up to and including 1.8 did not properly validate user accounts when authenticating. A user with a valid password for a disabled account would be able to bypass security restrictions and possibly access sensitive information."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-02-02T10:57:01",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171107 [SECURITY] [DLA 1165-1] libpam4j security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00008.html"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:2904",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2904"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:2905",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2905"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:2906",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2906"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4025",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4025"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503103"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-12197",
"datePublished": "2018-01-18T21:00:00Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-08-01T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:28:16.597Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…