CVE-2016-7541 (GCVE-0-2016-7541)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2017-03-30 14:00
Modified
2024-10-25 14:35
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- Protection bypass
Summary
Long lived sessions in Fortinet FortiGate devices with FortiOS 5.x before 5.4.0 could violate a security policy during IPS signature updates when the FortiGate's IPSengine is configured in flow mode. All FortiGate versions with IPS configured in proxy mode (the default mode) are not affected.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:04:54.872Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "94477",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94477"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2016-7541",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-23T14:00:59.214273Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-25T14:35:50.321Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FortiOS",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.x, 5.2.x"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2016-11-22T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Long lived sessions in Fortinet FortiGate devices with FortiOS 5.x before 5.4.0 could violate a security policy during IPS signature updates when the FortiGate\u0027s IPSengine is configured in flow mode. All FortiGate versions with IPS configured in proxy mode (the default mode) are not affected."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Protection bypass",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-03-31T09:57:02",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "94477",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94477"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "psirt@fortinet.com",
"ID": "CVE-2016-7541",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "FortiOS",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "5.0.x, 5.2.x"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Fortinet"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Long lived sessions in Fortinet FortiGate devices with FortiOS 5.x before 5.4.0 could violate a security policy during IPS signature updates when the FortiGate\u0027s IPSengine is configured in flow mode. All FortiGate versions with IPS configured in proxy mode (the default mode) are not affected."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Protection bypass"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "94477",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94477"
},
{
"name": "http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-7541",
"datePublished": "2017-03-30T14:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2016-09-09T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-25T14:35:50.321Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94477\", \"name\": \"94477\", \"tags\": [\"vdb-entry\", \"x_refsource_BID\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-06T02:04:54.872Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2016-7541\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-10-23T14:00:59.214273Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-10-23T14:02:07.683Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Fortinet\", \"product\": \"FortiOS\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.0.x, 5.2.x\"}]}], \"datePublic\": \"2016-11-22T00:00:00\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94477\", \"name\": \"94477\", \"tags\": [\"vdb-entry\", \"x_refsource_BID\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Long lived sessions in Fortinet FortiGate devices with FortiOS 5.x before 5.4.0 could violate a security policy during IPS signature updates when the FortiGate\u0027s IPSengine is configured in flow mode. All FortiGate versions with IPS configured in proxy mode (the default mode) are not affected.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"Protection bypass\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8\", \"shortName\": \"fortinet\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2017-03-31T09:57:02\"}, \"x_legacyV4Record\": {\"affects\": {\"vendor\": {\"vendor_data\": [{\"product\": {\"product_data\": [{\"version\": {\"version_data\": [{\"version_value\": \"5.0.x, 5.2.x\"}]}, \"product_name\": \"FortiOS\"}]}, \"vendor_name\": \"Fortinet\"}]}}, \"data_type\": \"CVE\", \"references\": {\"reference_data\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94477\", \"name\": \"94477\", \"refsource\": \"BID\"}, {\"url\": \"http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088\", \"name\": \"http://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-16-088\", \"refsource\": \"CONFIRM\"}]}, \"data_format\": \"MITRE\", \"description\": {\"description_data\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"Long lived sessions in Fortinet FortiGate devices with FortiOS 5.x before 5.4.0 could violate a security policy during IPS signature updates when the FortiGate\u0027s IPSengine is configured in flow mode. All FortiGate versions with IPS configured in proxy mode (the default mode) are not affected.\"}]}, \"problemtype\": {\"problemtype_data\": [{\"description\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"Protection bypass\"}]}]}, \"data_version\": \"4.0\", \"CVE_data_meta\": {\"ID\": \"CVE-2016-7541\", \"STATE\": \"PUBLIC\", \"ASSIGNER\": \"psirt@fortinet.com\"}}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2016-7541\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-10-25T14:35:50.321Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2016-09-09T00:00:00\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8\", \"datePublished\": \"2017-03-30T14:00:00\", \"assignerShortName\": \"fortinet\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…