CVE-2008-5850 (GCVE-0-2008-5850)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a "SPLAT Remote Root Exploit" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor. No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim. The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability. Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2009-01-10T10:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: None.  Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a \"SPLAT Remote Root Exploit\" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter.  The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor.  No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim.  The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability.  Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2008-5850",
    "datePublished": "2009-01-06T17:00:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2009-01-10T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2009-01-06T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2009-01-10T10:00:00.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.