CVE-2007-0434 (GCVE-0-2007-0434)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2007-01-23 02:00
Modified
2024-08-07 12:19
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
BEA AquaLogic Enterprise Security 2.0 through 2.0 SP2, 2.1 through 2.1 SP1, and 2.2 does not properly set the severity level of audit events when the system load is high, which might make it easier for attackers to avoid detection.
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T12:19:30.170Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "22082",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22082"
},
{
"name": "BEA07-153.00",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_BEA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/advisory/220"
},
{
"name": "23786",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/23786"
},
{
"name": "32860",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_OSVDB",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://osvdb.org/32860"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2007-01-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "BEA AquaLogic Enterprise Security 2.0 through 2.0 SP2, 2.1 through 2.1 SP1, and 2.2 does not properly set the severity level of audit events when the system load is high, which might make it easier for attackers to avoid detection."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2007-09-13T09:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "22082",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22082"
},
{
"name": "BEA07-153.00",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_BEA"
],
"url": "http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/advisory/220"
},
{
"name": "23786",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/23786"
},
{
"name": "32860",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_OSVDB"
],
"url": "http://osvdb.org/32860"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2007-0434",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "BEA AquaLogic Enterprise Security 2.0 through 2.0 SP2, 2.1 through 2.1 SP1, and 2.2 does not properly set the severity level of audit events when the system load is high, which might make it easier for attackers to avoid detection."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "22082",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22082"
},
{
"name": "BEA07-153.00",
"refsource": "BEA",
"url": "http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/advisory/220"
},
{
"name": "23786",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/23786"
},
{
"name": "32860",
"refsource": "OSVDB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/32860"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2007-0434",
"datePublished": "2007-01-23T02:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2007-01-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T12:19:30.170Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…