CVE-2004-2654 (GCVE-0-2004-2654)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2006-02-24 11:00
Modified
2024-08-08 01:36
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference. NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor's bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T01:36:24.583Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
},
{
"name": "1011214",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
},
{
"name": "9801",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_OSVDB",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
},
{
"name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_VIM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
},
{
"name": "12754",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
},
{
"name": "12508",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2004-04-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference. NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2007-01-10T10:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
},
{
"name": "1011214",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK"
],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
},
{
"name": "9801",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_OSVDB"
],
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
},
{
"name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_VIM"
],
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
},
{
"name": "12754",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
},
{
"name": "12508",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2004-2654",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference. NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
},
{
"name": "1011214",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
},
{
"name": "9801",
"refsource": "OSVDB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
},
{
"name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
"refsource": "VIM",
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
},
{
"name": "12754",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
},
{
"name": "12508",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2004-2654",
"datePublished": "2006-02-24T11:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2006-02-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T01:36:24.583Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…