CERTA-2011-AVI-104
Vulnerability from certfr_avis

Une vulnérabilité permettant d'effectuer un déni de service à distance a été identifiée dans le produit Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM).

Description

Une vulnérabilité dans le module d'inspection de trafic SCCP (protocole Skinny) peut entrainer un rechargement de la configuration de l'équipement lors du traitement d'un paquet spécifiquement conçu. Par défaut, l'inspection du trafic SCCP est activée.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Les versions 3.1(20), 3.2(20), 4.0(15) et 4.1(5) corrigent ce problème. Il est aussi possible de déscativer l'inspection du trafic SCCP via la commande no inspect skinny si ce protocole n'est pas utilisé dans le réseau.

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco N/A Cisco Firewall Services Module 4.x.
Cisco N/A Cisco Firewall Services Module 3.x ;
References

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco Firewall Services Module 4.x.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Firewall Services Module 3.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans le module d\u0027inspection de trafic SCCP (protocole\nSkinny) peut entrainer un rechargement de la configuration de\nl\u0027\u00e9quipement lors du traitement d\u0027un paquet sp\u00e9cifiquement con\u00e7u. Par\nd\u00e9faut, l\u0027inspection du trafic SCCP est activ\u00e9e.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n\nLes versions 3.1(20), 3.2(20), 4.0(15) et 4.1(5) corrigent ce probl\u00e8me.\nIl est aussi possible de d\u00e9scativer l\u0027inspection du trafic SCCP via la\ncommande no inspect skinny si ce protocole n\u0027est pas utilis\u00e9 dans le\nr\u00e9seau.\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-0394",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-0394"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2011-02-24T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2011-02-24T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20110223-fwsm du 23 f\u00e9vrier 2011    :",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20110223-fwsm.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-104",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-02-24T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permettant d\u0027effectuer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance a\n\u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9e dans le produit Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM).\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Cisco Firewall Services Module",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco-sa-20110223-fwsm",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.