CERTA-2006-AVI-004
Vulnerability from certfr_avis
Une vulnérabilité présente dans Cisco Secure ACS (Access Control Server) peut être exploitée par un utilisateur mal intentionné du réseau local pour contourner la politique de sécurité mise en place.
Description
La vulnérabilité présente sur Cisco Secure ACS est due à une erreur de conception dans le téléchargement des IP ACL.
Un utilisateur mal intentionné peut, en utilisant le nom du fichier de téléchargement des IP ACL, s'authentifier au serveur d'authentification (RAS/NAS) et ainsi contourner la politique de sécurité.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
NoneImpacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | N/A | Cisco Secure versions ACS 3.x antérieures à la version 4.0.1. | ||
| Cisco | N/A | VPN3000 Concentrator ; | ||
| Cisco | N/A | VPN3000 Hardware Client 3.x ; | ||
| Cisco | N/A | Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 1.x ; | ||
| Cisco | N/A | Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 2.x ; | ||
| Cisco | N/A | Cisco versions Pix 6.x antérieures à la version 6.3(5) ; | ||
| Cisco | N/A | Cisco versions Pix 7.x antérieures à la version 7.0(2) ; |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Cisco Secure versions ACS 3.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la version 4.0.1.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "VPN3000 Concentrator ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "VPN3000 Hardware Client 3.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 1.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 2.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco versions Pix 6.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la version 6.3(5) ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco versions Pix 7.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la version 7.0(2) ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nLa vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente sur Cisco Secure ACS est due \u00e0 une erreur de\nconception dans le t\u00e9l\u00e9chargement des IP ACL.\n\nUn utilisateur mal intentionn\u00e9 peut, en utilisant le nom du fichier de\nt\u00e9l\u00e9chargement des IP ACL, s\u0027authentifier au serveur d\u0027authentification\n(RAS/NAS) et ainsi contourner la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [],
"initial_release_date": "2006-01-04T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2006-01-04T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Information Cisco du 26 d\u00e9cembre 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_fiel_notice09186a00805bf1c4.shtml"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-004",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2006-01-04T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente dans Cisco Secure ACS (Access Control Server)\npeut \u00eatre exploit\u00e9e par un utilisateur mal intentionn\u00e9 du r\u00e9seau local\npour contourner la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 mise en place.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 sur CISCO ACS",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Information CISCO du 26 d\u00e9cembre",
"url": null
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…