Search
Find a vulnerability
Search criteria
2 vulnerabilities by ChainSafe
CVE-2022-29219 (GCVE-0-2022-29219)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-24 14:15 – Updated: 2025-04-23 18:22
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Integer Overflow in Lodestar
Summary
Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-04-23 15:54 UTC
CWE
- CWE-190 - Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Assigner
GitHub_M
CNA
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/ad… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/ta… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T06:17:54.286Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-29219",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T15:54:48.726800Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:22:36.298Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "lodestar",
"vendor": "ChainSafe",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.36.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-190",
"description": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-05-24T14:15:14.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Integer Overflow in Lodestar",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-29219",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Integer Overflow in Lodestar"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "lodestar",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c 0.36.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "ChainSafe"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-29219",
"datePublished": "2022-05-24T14:15:14.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:22:36.298Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-24759 (GCVE-0-2022-24759)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-03-17 16:40 – Updated: 2025-04-23 18:46
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Failure to validate signature during handshake in @chainsafe/libp2p-noise
Summary
`@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` contains TypeScript implementation of noise protocol, an encryption protocol used in libp2p. `@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` before 4.1.2 and 5.0.3 does not correctly validate signatures during the handshake process. This may allow a man-in-the-middle to pose as other peers and get those peers banned. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.2 or 5.0.3 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-04-23 14:08 UTC
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
GitHub_M
CNA
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/pull/130 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/rele… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChainSafe | js-libp2p-noise |
Affected:
< 4.1.2
Affected: >= 5.0.0, < 5.0.3 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T04:20:50.504Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/security/advisories/GHSA-j3ff-xp6c-6gcc"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/pull/130"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/releases/tag/v5.0.3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-24759",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T14:08:49.865065Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:46:39.631Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "js-libp2p-noise",
"vendor": "ChainSafe",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.1.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 5.0.0, \u003c 5.0.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "`@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` contains TypeScript implementation of noise protocol, an encryption protocol used in libp2p. `@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` before 4.1.2 and 5.0.3 does not correctly validate signatures during the handshake process. This may allow a man-in-the-middle to pose as other peers and get those peers banned. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.2 or 5.0.3 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-03-17T16:40:11.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/security/advisories/GHSA-j3ff-xp6c-6gcc"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/pull/130"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/releases/tag/v5.0.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-j3ff-xp6c-6gcc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Failure to validate signature during handshake in @chainsafe/libp2p-noise",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-24759",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Failure to validate signature during handshake in @chainsafe/libp2p-noise"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "js-libp2p-noise",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c 4.1.2"
},
{
"version_value": "\u003e= 5.0.0, \u003c 5.0.3"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "ChainSafe"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "`@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` contains TypeScript implementation of noise protocol, an encryption protocol used in libp2p. `@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` before 4.1.2 and 5.0.3 does not correctly validate signatures during the handshake process. This may allow a man-in-the-middle to pose as other peers and get those peers banned. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.2 or 5.0.3 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/security/advisories/GHSA-j3ff-xp6c-6gcc",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/security/advisories/GHSA-j3ff-xp6c-6gcc"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/pull/130",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/pull/130"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/releases/tag/v5.0.3",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/releases/tag/v5.0.3"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-j3ff-xp6c-6gcc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-24759",
"datePublished": "2022-03-17T16:40:11.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-02-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:46:39.631Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}