CWE-345
DiscouragedInsufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
549 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-92360 (GCVE-0-2026-92360)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:45| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/405446 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/405446/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-92360 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/934950 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/issues/2437 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/pull/2701 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/ | product |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ag-ui-protocol | ag-ui |
Affected:
1.0
cpe:2.3:a:ag-ui-protocol:ag-ui:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-92360",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:10:01.076643Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:45:46.190Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ag-ui-protocol:ag-ui:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Event Application Layer"
],
"product": "ag-ui",
"vendor": "ag-ui-protocol",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "meraklbz (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui 1.0. The impacted element is the function prepareRunAgentInput of the file agent/agent.ts of the component Event Application Layer. This manipulation of the argument TEXT_MESSAGE_START causes origin validation error. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-346",
"description": "Origin Validation Error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T12:30:09.510Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-405446 | ag-ui-protocol ag-ui Event Application Layer agent.ts prepareRunAgentInput origin validation",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/405446"
},
{
"name": "VDB-405446 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/405446/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-92360 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-92360"
},
{
"name": "Submit #934950 | ag-ui-protocol ag-ui v1.0 CWE-346",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/934950"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/issues/2437"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/pull/2701"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-16T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-16T07:41:53.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "ag-ui-protocol ag-ui Event Application Layer agent.ts prepareRunAgentInput origin validation",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202609"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-92360",
"datePublished": "2026-09-16T12:30:09.510Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-16T05:36:05.161Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:45:46.190Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-92161 (GCVE-0-2026-92161)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 15:53 – Updated: 2026-09-29 19:21- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/commit/b… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/commit/b… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FriendsOfFlarum | oauth |
Affected:
< 1.7.4
Affected: >= 2.0.0-beta.1, < 2.0.0-beta.4 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-92161",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T19:20:48.556795Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T19:21:01.907Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "oauth",
"vendor": "FriendsOfFlarum",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.7.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.0.0-beta.1, \u003c 2.0.0-beta.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FriendsOfFlarum OAuth allows users to log in to Flarum with GitHub, Twitter, Facebook, and other providers. Prior to 1.7.4 and 2.0.0-beta.4, the Discord OAuth provider does not check the verified field returned for an OAuth email before passing the address to Flarum core as trusted through provideTrustedEmail(). When Discord sign-in is enabled, an unauthenticated attacker who knows the email address of a Flarum user can configure a Discord account with that unverified address and a verified phone number, then sign in to cause Flarum to match the trusted address, link the attacker-controlled Discord identity to the existing user, and authenticate as the victim without a password or victim interaction. Exploitation requires that the victim\u0027s email address is not already associated with a Discord account, and it can compromise administrator accounts. Other bundled providers were not confirmed to be practically exploitable by this method because their relevant authentication flows return only verified or confirmed email addresses. This issue is fixed in versions 1.7.4 and 2.0.0-beta.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T15:53:34.825Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/security/advisories/GHSA-g7vj-c29h-3h5m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/security/advisories/GHSA-g7vj-c29h-3h5m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/commit/baca3466b3b7be51c70a7e0ba966901aefeb344a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/commit/baca3466b3b7be51c70a7e0ba966901aefeb344a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/commit/bb4bf376832e6bb68c579715d2a4b5a92c4a2567",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/commit/bb4bf376832e6bb68c579715d2a4b5a92c4a2567"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/releases/tag/1.7.4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/releases/tag/1.7.4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/releases/tag/2.0.0-beta.4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfFlarum/oauth/releases/tag/2.0.0-beta.4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-g7vj-c29h-3h5m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FriendsOfFlarum OAuth: Unauthenticated account takeover via unverified email trust in Discord OAuth provider"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-92161",
"datePublished": "2026-09-25T15:53:34.825Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-15T17:13:57.866Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T19:21:01.907Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-89251 (GCVE-0-2026-89251)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-11 11:15 – Updated: 2026-09-11 18:22- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisorie… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/avideo-missi… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89251",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-11T18:22:34.668707Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T18:22:41.339Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-cwrf-q9jv-44px"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "AVideo",
"vendor": "WWBN",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wwbn:avideo:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "santhreal"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 fails to validate ad impressions in plugin/AD_Server/log.php, allowing logged-in users to submit arbitrary label values that trigger unverified wallet credits to campaign video owners. Attackers can repeatedly POST label=start requests to mint YPTWallet balance for any campaign video without proof an ad actually played."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T11:15:29.431Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-cwrf-q9jv-44px)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-cwrf-q9jv-44px"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: AVideo Missing Authorization via AD_Server log.php Wallet Credit",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/avideo-missing-authorization-via-ad-server-log-php-wallet-credit"
}
],
"title": "AVideo Missing Authorization via AD_Server log.php Wallet Credit",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89251",
"datePublished": "2026-09-11T11:15:29.431Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-11T10:51:59.215Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T18:22:41.339Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88982 (GCVE-0-2026-88982)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-05 22:25 – Updated: 2026-11-10 04:44| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/security/ad… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/14359 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/commit/620d… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/releases/ta… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88982",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-10T04:44:20.203048Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T04:44:31.733Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "pipelines",
"vendor": "kubeflow",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.18.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.18.0, the legacy V1/raw-Argo execution cache mutating webhook and cache-server storage path hash selected template fields without the Kubernetes namespace, use the key alone for lookups and duplicate checks, and trust the mutable pipelines.kubeflow.org/execution_cache_key annotation when publishing outputs. In multi-user deployments where tenant namespaces share the cache service, a tenant with workload-submission privileges can read another namespace\u0027s cached outputs or seed matching outputs that are substituted into a later step. Standard KFP V2 component pods bypass this cache, matching requires the selected template fields and staleness policy, and arbitrary code execution or service availability impact is not established. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T22:25:58.995Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/security/advisories/GHSA-2xwh-426q-42c5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/security/advisories/GHSA-2xwh-426q-42c5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/14359",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/14359"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/commit/620d0cc89ae0d042a484a003f8ffe6e9a55d347e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/commit/620d0cc89ae0d042a484a003f8ffe6e9a55d347e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/releases/tag/2.18.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/releases/tag/2.18.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2xwh-426q-42c5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Kubeflow Pipelines: Cross-tenant execution-cache poisoning / output substitution via a namespace-blind cache key in the cache webhook (multi-user)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88982",
"datePublished": "2026-11-05T22:25:58.995Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T16:02:31.342Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T04:44:31.733Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88819 (GCVE-0-2026-88819)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-09-14 19:23| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse Data Plane Core |
Affected:
a6f7d4cc0093931287c349e1e546ad2932c08e8d , < 882fe22db42bc67abfd0304c4cdb141b762c35d1
(git)
Affected: 0.1.0 , ≤ 0.1.3 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88819",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T19:12:37.702936Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:23:00.453Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse Data Plane Core",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "882fe22db42bc67abfd0304c4cdb141b762c35d1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a6f7d4cc0093931287c349e1e546ad2932c08e8d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Eclipse Foundation Security Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In Siglet current and past versions the refresh token handler do not enforce proof of possession of the issuer DID."
}
],
"value": "In Siglet current and past versions the refresh token handler do not enforce proof of possession of the issuer DID."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290 Authentication bypass by spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T15:32:36.047Z",
"orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"shortName": "eclipse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/931"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"assignerShortName": "eclipse",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88819",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T15:32:36.047Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T08:53:25.943Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:23:00.453Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-86039 (GCVE-0-2026-86039)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-17 15:19 – Updated: 2026-09-21 20:48| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3570 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/3bf5d3… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-86039",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-21T20:48:30.538605Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T20:48:54.323Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "js-libp2p",
"vendor": "libp2p",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 12.0.24"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "libp2p is a JavaScript implementation of the libp2p networking stack. From 8.0.0 until 12.0.24, @libp2p/peer-store in packages/peer-store/src/index.ts uses consumePeerRecord to verify a RecordEnvelope signature but does not require PeerRecord.peerId in the signed payload to equal the signer peer ID derived by RecordEnvelope.openAndCertify. The expectedPeer option checks only the envelope signer, and the gossipsub Peer Exchange path can provide the attacker\u0027s own peer ID as expectedPeer. An attacker can therefore sign a record with the attacker\u0027s key, place a victim peer ID and attacker-controlled multiaddrs in the payload, and have certified addresses stored for the victim. The poisoned addresses can cause address-book corruption, dial redirection or failure, routing manipulation, and reachability disruption, although the connection upgrade still verifies remote peer identity and prevents a complete identity takeover. The issue is fixed in version 12.0.24."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T15:19:00.697Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3570",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3570"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/3bf5d395cbca1488eea6e87cd771e4613b661c30",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/3bf5d395cbca1488eea6e87cd771e4613b661c30"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/peer-store-v12.0.24",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/peer-store-v12.0.24"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "libp2p: PeerStore accepts attacker-signed PeerRecords for a victim peer ID and stores certified attacker addresses"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-86039",
"datePublished": "2026-09-17T15:19:00.697Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-04T19:29:21.058Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T20:48:54.323Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-86038 (GCVE-0-2026-86038)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-17 15:16 – Updated: 2026-09-17 17:24| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3569 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/cec2b1… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-86038",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T17:24:10.344562Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T17:24:35.905Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "js-libp2p",
"vendor": "libp2p",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 15.0.0, \u003c 16.0.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "libp2p is a JavaScript implementation of the libp2p networking stack. From 15.0.0 until 16.0.5, @libp2p/gossipsub uses the default StrictSign policy in packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts, where validateToRawMessage verifies a signature with attacker-controlled msg.key but skips binding that key to msg.from when the claimed author is an RSA peer ID that does not inline a public key. An unauthenticated attacker can place a victim RSA peer ID in msg.from, sign the message with the attacker\u0027s private key, and supply the attacker\u0027s public key in msg.key, causing the message to be accepted and propagated as authored by the victim. Applications that trust message.from for validators, authorization, accounting, moderation, reputation, or audit logging can process attacker-controlled data under false origin attribution. The issue is fixed in version 16.0.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T15:16:57.882Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3569",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3569"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/cec2b1f349d130065e561349a0336a239528267f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/cec2b1f349d130065e561349a0336a239528267f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/gossipsub-v16.0.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/gossipsub-v16.0.5"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "libp2p: Gossipsub StrictSign accepts attacker-signed messages as a victim RSA peer ID"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-86038",
"datePublished": "2026-09-17T15:16:57.882Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-04T19:29:21.057Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T17:24:35.905Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-85621 (GCVE-0-2026-85621)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-04 14:32 – Updated: 2026-09-08 16:54- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/issues/16538 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub | product |
| https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/p… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/p… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lobechat-2.2… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-85621",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-08T16:53:46.727439Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T16:54:13.063Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/issues/16538"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "lobehub",
"vendor": "lobehub",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.2.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:lobehub:lobehub:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "2.2.15",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "George Chen"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner\u0027s agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T14:32:12.595Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #16538",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/issues/16538"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/packages/chat-adapter-qq/src/adapter.ts"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/packages/chat-adapter-feishu/src/adapter.ts"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: LobeChat 2.2.1 Webhook Signature Verification Bypass QQ Feishu",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lobechat-2.2.1-webhook-signature-verification-bypass-qq-feishu"
}
],
"title": "LobeChat 2.2.1 Webhook Signature Verification Bypass QQ Feishu",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-85621",
"datePublished": "2026-09-04T14:32:12.595Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-04T11:03:33.315Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T16:54:13.063Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-85515 (GCVE-0-2026-85515)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-03 08:05 – Updated: 2026-10-05 18:04| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%9… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/ab7a235d1… | patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | BC-JAVA |
Affected:
1.74 , < 1.86
(maven)
|
|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | BC-LTS-JAVA |
Affected:
2.73.0 , < 2.73.13
(maven)
|
|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | BC-FJA |
Affected:
1.0.7 , < 1.0.14
(maven)
Affected: 2.0.7 , < 2.0.14.1 (maven) Affected: 2.1.0 , < 2.1.14 (maven) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-85515",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-05T18:03:26.858540Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T18:04:19.704Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"pg"
],
"packageName": "bcpg",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpg-jdk18on",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "BC-JAVA",
"programFiles": [
"BcAEADUtil",
"JceAEADUtil",
"IntegrityProtectedInputStream",
"OpenPGPMessageInputStream"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.86",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.74",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java-lts/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"pg"
],
"packageName": "bcpg-lts8on",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpg-lts8on",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "BC-LTS-JAVA",
"programFiles": [
"BcAEADUtil",
"JceAEADUtil"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-lts-java",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.73.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.73.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java-fips/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "bcpg-fips",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpg-fips",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "BC-FJA",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.7",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.0.14.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.7",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.1.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Arpan Sharma"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, a truncated OpenPGP encrypted message was accepted with no error reported, and on the SEIPD version 1 path with no integrity check performed at all. RFC 9580 sec. 13.7 permits an implementation to release the cleartext of the fully authenticated chunks when streaming but requires it to indicate a clear error as soon as the truncation is detected, and to report suspect integrity when it discovers malleable ciphertext. The truncation was detected and then discarded: when a message is truncated but the length field of the enclosing packet is left unchanged, BCPGInputStream.PartialInputStream raises an EOFException for the missing ciphertext, and BCPGInputStream.nextPacketTag() reports an EOFException as a clean end of message, so the packet stream above it stopped as though no packets remained. On the AEAD path (SEIPD version 2 and the version 5 AEAD packet), when the literal data packet ended on an AEAD chunk boundary and the consumer read in increments smaller than one chunk, the look-ahead for the packet after the literal triggered the truncated chunk read, so BcAEADUtil and JceAEADUtil never reached the trailing message tag of sec. 5.13.2 that authenticates the total plaintext length; the caller received the plaintext of the fully authenticated chunks, every packet following the literal was silently dropped, and no exception was raised, so a signed and encrypted message read back as a well-formed unsigned one. Every byte released on that path remained individually authenticated, making this a missing truncation error rather than a forgery, and it is a residual of CVE-2026-12817, which closed the same outcome for an attacker who corrects the outer packet length. On the SEIPD version 1 path the consequence was more serious: IntegrityProtectedInputStream verifies the modification detection code from close(), and reached close() only by closing itself when a read of it returned -1, which a truncated message never produces, so PGPEncryptedData.verify() never ran and the recipient was handed CFB-decrypted plaintext on which no integrity check of any kind had been performed. Measured on a message truncated into that shape, 136 distinct single-byte modifications of the ciphertext produced accepted, altered plaintext with no exception raised. Reachability is a property of the message rather than of attacker-supplied input: the AEAD shape held for 3 of 131 consecutive payload lengths measured, and the SEIPD version 1 shape for one payload length in sixteen, at a truncation offset that did not move with the payload length. The low-level API is unaffected, a caller that invokes PGPEncryptedData.verify() directly getting the check regardless, as are consumers reading in increments of a whole AEAD chunk or more. The AEAD decryption streams now re-throw such an EOFException as a plain IOException, which nextPacketTag() does not launder; OpenPGPMessageInputStream.close() now closes its layer\u0027s integrity-protected stream itself rather than relying on that stream having seen the end of its data; and IntegrityProtectedInputStream.close() was made idempotent, as java.io.Closeable requires, which that depends on, since the stream is genuinely closed twice on the ordinary path and PGPEncryptedData.verify() consumes the digest state behind it and cannot be run a second time. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, on the AEAD route only, as that edition does not ship the high-level OpenPGP API the SEIPDv1 route runs through. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.14 (1.0.X series), 2.0.14.1 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.14 (2.1.X series), on the AEAD route only, as those editions do not ship the high-level OpenPGP API.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, a truncated OpenPGP encrypted message was accepted with no error reported, and on the SEIPD version 1 path with no integrity check performed at all. RFC 9580 sec. 13.7 permits an implementation to release the cleartext of the fully authenticated chunks when streaming but requires it to indicate a clear error as soon as the truncation is detected, and to report suspect integrity when it discovers malleable ciphertext. The truncation was detected and then discarded: when a message is truncated but the length field of the enclosing packet is left unchanged, BCPGInputStream.PartialInputStream raises an EOFException for the missing ciphertext, and BCPGInputStream.nextPacketTag() reports an EOFException as a clean end of message, so the packet stream above it stopped as though no packets remained. On the AEAD path (SEIPD version 2 and the version 5 AEAD packet), when the literal data packet ended on an AEAD chunk boundary and the consumer read in increments smaller than one chunk, the look-ahead for the packet after the literal triggered the truncated chunk read, so BcAEADUtil and JceAEADUtil never reached the trailing message tag of sec. 5.13.2 that authenticates the total plaintext length; the caller received the plaintext of the fully authenticated chunks, every packet following the literal was silently dropped, and no exception was raised, so a signed and encrypted message read back as a well-formed unsigned one. Every byte released on that path remained individually authenticated, making this a missing truncation error rather than a forgery, and it is a residual of CVE-2026-12817, which closed the same outcome for an attacker who corrects the outer packet length. On the SEIPD version 1 path the consequence was more serious: IntegrityProtectedInputStream verifies the modification detection code from close(), and reached close() only by closing itself when a read of it returned -1, which a truncated message never produces, so PGPEncryptedData.verify() never ran and the recipient was handed CFB-decrypted plaintext on which no integrity check of any kind had been performed. Measured on a message truncated into that shape, 136 distinct single-byte modifications of the ciphertext produced accepted, altered plaintext with no exception raised. Reachability is a property of the message rather than of attacker-supplied input: the AEAD shape held for 3 of 131 consecutive payload lengths measured, and the SEIPD version 1 shape for one payload length in sixteen, at a truncation offset that did not move with the payload length. The low-level API is unaffected, a caller that invokes PGPEncryptedData.verify() directly getting the check regardless, as are consumers reading in increments of a whole AEAD chunk or more. The AEAD decryption streams now re-throw such an EOFException as a plain IOException, which nextPacketTag() does not launder; OpenPGPMessageInputStream.close() now closes its layer\u0027s integrity-protected stream itself rather than relying on that stream having seen the end of its data; and IntegrityProtectedInputStream.close() was made idempotent, as java.io.Closeable requires, which that depends on, since the stream is genuinely closed twice on the ordinary path and PGPEncryptedData.verify() consumes the digest state behind it and cannot be run a second time. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, on the AEAD route only, as that edition does not ship the high-level OpenPGP API the SEIPDv1 route runs through. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.14 (1.0.X series), 2.0.14.1 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.14 (2.1.X series), on the AEAD route only, as those editions do not ship the high-level OpenPGP API."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-03T08:05:16.553Z",
"orgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"shortName": "bcorg"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%9085515"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/ab7a235d1c20e3da28ce77167a96b5c14025efa7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "OpenPGP message truncation not reported, bypassing the SEIPDv1 integrity check",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bc release-notes template"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"assignerShortName": "bcorg",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-85515",
"datePublished": "2026-10-03T08:05:16.553Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-04T05:38:18.070Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T18:04:19.704Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-85435 (GCVE-0-2026-85435)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-03 22:38 – Updated: 2026-09-04 17:23- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/pull/124 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/commit/d6639… | patch |
| https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp | product |
| https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/blob/1de9ae1… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ivp-thr… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-85435",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-04T17:23:01.168416Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T17:23:16.503Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "moos-ivp",
"vendor": "moos-ivp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "24.8.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Vlatko Kosturjak"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "MOOS-IvP uFldNodeBroker through 24.8.1 fails to validate the source of TRY_SHORE_HOST messages on the vehicle bus, allowing any publisher to enroll attacker-controlled shore routes. Attackers can publish malicious shore route messages to receive bridged vehicle traffic including sensor data and control information."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T22:38:27.809Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Pull Request #124",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/pull/124"
},
{
"name": "Proposed fix commit (pull request not merged)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/commit/d66394f576cae0c63c0a777760e1595802b83edf"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp"
},
{
"name": "NodeBroker.cpp (verified sink)",
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/blob/1de9ae146cd63c209e8c3fd81611a4ed2472971b/ivp/src/uFldNodeBroker/NodeBroker.cpp#L97"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 uFldNodeBroker Unauthenticated Shore Route Enrollment",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ivp-through-24.8.1-ufldnodebroker-unauthenticated-shore-route-enrollment"
}
],
"title": "MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 uFldNodeBroker Unauthenticated Shore Route Enrollment",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-85435",
"datePublished": "2026-09-03T22:38:27.809Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-03T19:50:55.884Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T17:23:16.503Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-148: Content Spoofing
An adversary modifies content to make it contain something other than what the original content producer intended while keeping the apparent source of the content unchanged. The term content spoofing is most often used to describe modification of web pages hosted by a target to display the adversary's content instead of the owner's content. However, any content can be spoofed, including the content of email messages, file transfers, or the content of other network communication protocols. Content can be modified at the source (e.g. modifying the source file for a web page) or in transit (e.g. intercepting and modifying a message between the sender and recipient). Usually, the adversary will attempt to hide the fact that the content has been modified, but in some cases, such as with web site defacement, this is not necessary. Content Spoofing can lead to malware exposure, financial fraud (if the content governs financial transactions), privacy violations, and other unwanted outcomes.
CAPEC-218: Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML Messages
An attacker spoofs a UDDI, ebXML, or similar message in order to impersonate a service provider in an e-business transaction. UDDI, ebXML, and similar standards are used to identify businesses in e-business transactions. Among other things, they identify a particular participant, WSDL information for SOAP transactions, and supported communication protocols, including security protocols. By spoofing one of these messages an attacker could impersonate a legitimate business in a transaction or could manipulate the protocols used between a client and business. This could result in disclosure of sensitive information, loss of message integrity, or even financial fraud.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.
CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)
An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.