CWE-79
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
26541 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-111110 (GCVE-0-2026-111110)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-17 07:51 – Updated: 2026-10-18 11:12- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| stiofansisland | Payment forms, Buy now buttons, and Invoicing System | GetPaid |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.8.61
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111110",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-18T11:06:55.448551Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-18T11:12:33.793Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Payment forms, Buy now buttons, and Invoicing System | GetPaid",
"vendor": "stiofansisland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.8.61",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "UKO"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Payment forms, Buy now buttons, and Invoicing System | GetPaid plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the \u0027mmdwqzpoxadd\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.61 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The required nonce (getpaid_form_nonce) is publicly emitted to all visitors via wp_localize_script as WPInv.formNonce, meaning no authentication or prior nonce leak is needed; the stored payload fires when an administrator views the affected invoice\u0027s Payment Form Details metabox."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-17T07:51:24.536Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2161ecdc-d3c2-4ede-9c42-28f30fa0f91e?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/invoicing/tags/2.8.61/includes/admin/meta-boxes/class-mb-payment-form.php#L30"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/invoicing/tags/2.8.61/includes/payments/class-getpaid-checkout.php#L293"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/invoicing/tags/2.8.61/includes/payments/class-getpaid-checkout.php#L402"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/invoicing/tags/2.8.61/includes/payments/class-getpaid-payment-form-submission.php#L150"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/invoicing/tags/2.8.61/includes/class-wpinv-ajax.php#L359"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/AyeCode/invoicing/archive/refs/heads/master.zip"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3750463/invoicing/trunk/includes/admin/meta-boxes/class-mb-payment-form.php"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-15T16:15:18.000Z",
"value": "Vendor Notified"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-16T19:36:58.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Payment forms, Buy now buttons, and Invoicing System | GetPaid \u003c= 2.8.61 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via \u0027mmdwqzpoxadd\u0027 Parameter"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111110",
"datePublished": "2026-10-17T07:51:24.536Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T15:58:49.835Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-18T11:12:33.793Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111109 (GCVE-0-2026-111109)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-31 06:44 – Updated: 2026-11-01 17:44- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pfefferle | Webmention |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 5.10.1
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111109",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-01T17:34:53.986526Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-01T17:44:30.159Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Webmention",
"vendor": "pfefferle",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "poiri3r"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Webmention plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the Open Graph og:title meta tag of a webmention source URL in versions up to, and including, 5.10.1. This is due to insufficient input sanitization: Meta::add_properties() maps og:title to the Item::name property, but Item has no concrete set_name() method, so Item::__call() stores the value raw while sibling set_content()/set_summary() paths route through webmention_sanitize_html(); Item::get_content() then falls back to the raw name when content and summary are empty, and Receiver::process() explicitly removes the core wp_filter_kses / wp_filter_post_kses hooks on pre_comment_content before calling wp_new_comment(), so the payload is persisted to comment_content as-is. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page, after an administrator approves the resulting pending webmention comment. Successful exploitation additionally requires an action by an administrator \u2014 the attacker cannot trigger the vulnerability on their own."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-31T06:44:14.112Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0b283d17-b89f-467d-8a79-cdf7b9bfdb65?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/webmention/tags/5.10.1/includes/handler/class-meta.php#L78"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/webmention/tags/5.10.1/includes/entity/class-item.php#L297"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/webmention/tags/5.10.1/includes/class-receiver.php#L453"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/webmention/tags/5.10.1/includes/entity/class-item.php#L125"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/webmention/tags/5.10.1/includes/class-receiver.php#L267"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/pfefferle/wordpress-webmention/pull/698"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/webmention/tags/5.10.2/includes/class-receiver.php"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-15T16:14:13.000Z",
"value": "Vendor Notified"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-30T18:16:01.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Webmention \u003c= 5.10.1 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Open Graph og:title Meta Tag"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111109",
"datePublished": "2026-10-31T06:44:14.112Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T15:58:12.238Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-01T17:44:30.159Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111089 (GCVE-0-2026-111089)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-01 22:32 – Updated: 2026-11-06 14:38- CWE-79 - Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/xyp4sm5mm7s6… | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Wicket |
Affected:
8.0.0 , ≤ 8.19.0
(semver)
Affected: 9.0.0 , ≤ 9.24.0 (semver) Affected: 10.0.0 , ≤ 10.11.0 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111089",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-06T14:38:19.026084Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T14:38:33.160Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.wicket:wicket-core",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.apache.wicket/wicket-core",
"product": "Apache Wicket",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.19.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.24.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.11.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Pedro Santos"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eApache Wicket reads texts from the application\u0027s resource bundles \u2014 a localized label, a css class name \u2014 and writes some of them into the JavaScript and the markup it generates for a component. Those texts are placed inside single-quoted JavaScript string literals and inside quoted attribute values without being escaped for that context, so a text containing a quote ends the literal or the attribute, and what follows is parsed as script or as markup in the application\u0027s origin when the page loads.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA resource bundle entry is authored for the application and does not say where the framework will write it. The same key is read by the framework into element text, where Wicket escapes it, and into the contexts below, where it did not. A text containing an apostrophe, which is ordinary in several languages, is enough to break the page; a text under the influence of another party is enough to run script.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn org.apache.wicket:wicket-core, org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.MultiFileUploadField writes the org.apache.wicket.mfu.delete message into a JavaScript string literal, and org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form writes the hidden-fields css class into the class attribute of the container it renders for its hidden fields; on 8.0.0 through 8.19.0 and 9.0.0 through 9.24.0 Form#appendDefaultButtonField writes the same css class into a second container. In org.apache.wicket:wicket-extensions, UploadProgressBar writes its UploadProgressBar.starting text into a JavaScript string literal, FilterForm writes the hidden-fields css class into the class attribute of its hidden input markup, and on 9.0.0 through 9.24.0 and 10.0.0 through 10.11.0 TrapFocusBehavior writes its current css class into a JavaScript string literal.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe Content-Security-Policy that Apache Wicket 9.x and 10.x send by default does not prevent the JavaScript cases: the generated script is written into a script element carrying the per-response nonce, so the injected code is part of a script the policy admits. It does prevent an inline event handler injected through the attribute cases.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.19.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.20.0, 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Apache Wicket reads texts from the application\u0027s resource bundles \u2014 a localized label, a css class name \u2014 and writes some of them into the JavaScript and the markup it generates for a component. Those texts are placed inside single-quoted JavaScript string literals and inside quoted attribute values without being escaped for that context, so a text containing a quote ends the literal or the attribute, and what follows is parsed as script or as markup in the application\u0027s origin when the page loads.\n\nA resource bundle entry is authored for the application and does not say where the framework will write it. The same key is read by the framework into element text, where Wicket escapes it, and into the contexts below, where it did not. A text containing an apostrophe, which is ordinary in several languages, is enough to break the page; a text under the influence of another party is enough to run script.\n\nIn org.apache.wicket:wicket-core, org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.MultiFileUploadField writes the org.apache.wicket.mfu.delete message into a JavaScript string literal, and org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form writes the hidden-fields css class into the class attribute of the container it renders for its hidden fields; on 8.0.0 through 8.19.0 and 9.0.0 through 9.24.0 Form#appendDefaultButtonField writes the same css class into a second container. In org.apache.wicket:wicket-extensions, UploadProgressBar writes its UploadProgressBar.starting text into a JavaScript string literal, FilterForm writes the hidden-fields css class into the class attribute of its hidden input markup, and on 9.0.0 through 9.24.0 and 10.0.0 through 10.11.0 TrapFocusBehavior writes its current css class into a JavaScript string literal.\n\nThe Content-Security-Policy that Apache Wicket 9.x and 10.x send by default does not prevent the JavaScript cases: the generated script is written into a script element carrying the per-response nonce, so the injected code is part of a script the policy admits. It does prevent an inline event handler injected through the attribute cases.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.19.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.20.0, 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper neutralization of input during web page generation (\u0027cross-site scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-01T22:32:09.104Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/xyp4sm5mm7s618fktstb22577qxbmqw8"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Wicket: XSS via a resource bundle text written unescaped into generated JavaScript and markup",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111089",
"datePublished": "2026-11-01T22:32:09.104Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T14:55:22.953Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T14:38:33.160Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111088 (GCVE-0-2026-111088)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-20 18:45 – Updated: 2026-10-29 18:23- CWE-79 - Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stormshield | Stormshield Network Security |
Affected:
4.3.0 , ≤ 4.3.44
(semver)
Affected: 4.8.0 , ≤ 4.8.19 (semver) Affected: 5.0.0 , ≤ 5.0.9 (semver) Affected: 5.1.0 , ≤ 5.1.3 (semver) Unaffected: 4.3.45 QS (semver) Unaffected: 4.8.20 LTSB (semver) Unaffected: 5.0.10 (semver) Unaffected: 5.1.4 EA (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111088",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-29T18:23:15.578824Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T18:23:52.543Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Stormshield Network Security",
"vendor": "Stormshield",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.3.44",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.8.19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.8.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.0.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.3.45 QS",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.8.20 LTSB",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.0.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.1.4 EA",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability exists in the SNS VPN log monitoring screen."
}
],
"value": "A Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability exists in the SNS VPN log monitoring screen."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper neutralization of input during web page generation (\u0027cross-site scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-20T18:45:33.737Z",
"orgId": "24a3c815-5f22-4d74-967a-30958d6466f4",
"shortName": "airbus"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://advisories.stormshield.eu/2026-030/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Stored XSS in the VPN logs monitor",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "24a3c815-5f22-4d74-967a-30958d6466f4",
"assignerShortName": "airbus",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111088",
"datePublished": "2026-10-20T18:45:33.737Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T14:52:56.464Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T18:23:52.543Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111070 (GCVE-0-2026-111070)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-31 07:46 – Updated: 2026-11-01 17:34- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pluginever | Content Pilot – Autoblogging & Affiliate Marketing Suite |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.2.4
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111070",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-01T17:34:12.606669Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-01T17:34:19.236Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Content Pilot \u2013 Autoblogging \u0026 Affiliate Marketing Suite",
"vendor": "pluginever",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Adrien Brunner"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Content Pilot \u2013 Autoblogging \u0026 Affiliate Marketing Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including, 2.2.4. This is due to the plugin extracting the HTML meta description from each remotely-fetched article (WPCP_Readability::parse_meta()), piping that value through the article template substitution and html_entity_decode() in WPCP_Module::insert_post(), and then calling wp_insert_post() after switching the current user to the configured campaign author (an Administrator with the unfiltered_html capability by default) \u2014 so no wp_kses_post sanitization is applied to the attacker-controlled HTML before it is persisted as post_content and rendered on the front end. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers who control the content of any RSS source an administrator has configured a Content Pilot RSS campaign to consume to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-31T07:46:52.404Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e3afda72-c10b-46e0-b187-03bcaeb77ea4?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-content-pilot/tags/2.2.4/includes/class-wpcp-module.php#L425"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-content-pilot/tags/2.2.4/includes/class-wpcp-module.php#L315"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-content-pilot/tags/2.2.4/includes/modules/class-wpcp-feed.php#L204"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-content-pilot/tags/2.2.4/includes/class-wpcp-readability.php#L182"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-content-pilot/tags/2.2.4/includes/class-wpcp-readability.php#L274"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-content-pilot/tags/2.2.5/includes/class-wpcp-module.php"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-15T20:48:22.000Z",
"value": "Vendor Notified"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-30T19:25:48.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Content Pilot \u003c= 2.2.4 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via RSS-linked article `\u003cmeta name=\"description\"\u003e`"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111070",
"datePublished": "2026-10-31T07:46:52.404Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T13:25:24.191Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-01T17:34:19.236Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111069 (GCVE-0-2026-111069)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-16 06:41 – Updated: 2026-10-16 14:39- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| paoltaia | GeoDirectory – WP Business Directory Plugin and Classified Listings Directory |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.8.192
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111069",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T14:34:08.980931Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T14:39:03.255Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GeoDirectory \u2013 WP Business Directory Plugin and Classified Listings Directory",
"vendor": "paoltaia",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.8.192",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "OKISO"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The GeoDirectory \u2013 WP Business Directory Plugin and Classified Listings Directory plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the \u0027twitterusername\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.192 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The client-side HTML pattern attribute enforcing alphanumeric-only input on the twitterusername field is not validated server-side, allowing a listing owner with Subscriber-level access to submit an attribute-breakout payload that bypasses sanitization and is stored directly to the custom field table."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T06:41:02.462Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/32052509-2fa6-4317-8861-314e6da0869f?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/geodirectory/tags/2.8.192/includes/custom-fields/output-filter-functions.php#L42"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/geodirectory/tags/2.8.192/includes/class-geodir-ajax.php#L821"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/geodirectory/tags/2.8.192/includes/class-geodir-post-data.php#L1661"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/geodirectory/tags/2.8.192/includes/class-geodir-post-data.php#L450"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/geodirectory/tags/2.8.192/includes/post-functions.php#L1950"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/AyeCode/geodirectory/archive/refs/heads/master.zip"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3748786/geodirectory/trunk/includes/custom-fields/output-filter-functions.php"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-15T13:40:45.000Z",
"value": "Vendor Notified"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-15T17:59:14.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "GeoDirectory \u003c= 2.8.192 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via \u0027twitterusername\u0027 Custom Field"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111069",
"datePublished": "2026-10-16T06:41:02.462Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T13:25:14.063Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T14:39:03.255Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111068 (GCVE-0-2026-111068)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-28 06:45 – Updated: 2026-10-29 01:41- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| justinnealey | DesignSetGo |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.11.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111068",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-29T01:34:08.771423Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T01:41:54.160Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "DesignSetGo",
"vendor": "justinnealey",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.11.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Wordfence PRISM"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The DesignSetGo plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the \u0027tagName\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to run the plugin\u0027s block-conversion migration (\"Scan \u0026 Convert Blocks\" during deactivation), which triggers the vulnerable build_group_block() function and promotes the dormant payload from a block delimiter comment into live post_content HTML. Successful exploitation additionally requires an action by an administrator \u2014 the attacker cannot trigger the vulnerability on their own."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T06:45:08.113Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2314df91-4e0a-4c8b-8f8e-8b8ae1b88524?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/designsetgo/tags/2.11.0/includes/admin/class-block-migrator.php#L1229"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/designsetgo/tags/2.11.0/includes/admin/class-block-migrator.php#L1134"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/designsetgo/tags/2.11.0/includes/admin/class-block-migrator.php#L144"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/jnealey-godaddy/designsetgo/pull/659"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3762066/designsetgo/trunk/includes/admin/class-block-migrator.php"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-23T15:25:29.000Z",
"value": "Vendor Notified"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-27T17:37:10.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "DesignSetGo \u003c= 2.11.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via \u0027tagName\u0027 Block Attribute"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111068",
"datePublished": "2026-10-28T06:45:08.113Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T13:25:08.167Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T01:41:54.160Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111059 (GCVE-0-2026-111059)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-19 16:11 – Updated: 2026-10-20 16:11| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/mljar/mercury/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/mljar/mercury/commit/c798a8592… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/mljar/mercury/releases/tag/v3.2.11 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111059",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-20T15:10:08.190617Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-20T16:11:40.067Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "mercury",
"vendor": "mljar",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.0.0, \u003c 3.2.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mercury is a Python framework for sharing Jupyter notebooks as web applications and dashboards. From 3.0.0 until 3.2.11, mr.Markdown converts attacker-controlled Markdown to HTML without sanitizing raw HTML before assigning it to an ipywidgets.HTML sink. Event-handler attributes and other active HTML can therefore reach the DOM and execute when another user views the application. This issue is fixed in version 3.2.11."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-116",
"description": "CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-19T16:11:29.745Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/mljar/mercury/security/advisories/GHSA-2658-85cv-9wwq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mljar/mercury/security/advisories/GHSA-2658-85cv-9wwq"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/mljar/mercury/commit/c798a85924e6614c6fea7afe5a560e4554a1d09b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mljar/mercury/commit/c798a85924e6614c6fea7afe5a560e4554a1d09b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/mljar/mercury/releases/tag/v3.2.11",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mljar/mercury/releases/tag/v3.2.11"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2658-85cv-9wwq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Mercury: Stored / DOM Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): mr.Markdown renders untrusted content as raw, unsanitized HTML"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111059",
"datePublished": "2026-10-19T16:11:29.745Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T12:47:13.664Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-20T16:11:40.067Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111048 (GCVE-0-2026-111048)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-02 17:46 – Updated: 2026-11-03 18:34- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/pull/4548 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOSSBilling | FOSSBilling |
Affected:
>= 0.1.0, < 0.8.9
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111048",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-03T17:49:08.850823Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T18:34:11.706Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FOSSBilling",
"vendor": "FOSSBilling",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.1.0, \u003c 0.8.9"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FOSSBilling is an open source billing and client-management platform. From 0.1.0 until 0.8.9, the admin/support/note_create endpoint stores the note parameter without sanitization in the support_ticket_note table, and src/modules/Support/templates/admin/mod_support_tickets.html.twig renders each stored support ticket note through innerHTML in the admin ticket list. A staff user with only the support.manage_tickets permission can store HTML or JavaScript that executes when another staff member opens the ticket notes. The script runs with the viewing staff member\u0027s session and privileges, can read a CSRF token and accessible client or invoice data, and can perform administrative actions available to the viewer, including a Super Administrator. The ticket detail page is not affected because its Twig rendering uses autoescaping. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T17:46:11.754Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-493h-fvcx-6q62",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-493h-fvcx-6q62"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/pull/4548",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/pull/4548"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/commit/87528920b6cb1ba6f113583253eb4d7abdd1d8c6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/commit/87528920b6cb1ba6f113583253eb4d7abdd1d8c6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-493h-fvcx-6q62",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FOSSBilling: Low-privileged staff can run JavaScript in administrators\u0027 browsers via stored XSS in support ticket notes"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111048",
"datePublished": "2026-11-02T17:46:11.754Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T12:47:13.664Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T18:34:11.706Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111037 (GCVE-0-2026-111037)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-04 09:35 – Updated: 2026-11-09 21:15- CWE-79 - Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coupa | Coupa Total Spend Management Platform |
Affected:
0 , < 04/11/2026
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:coupa:coupa_total_spend_management_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111037",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-09T21:15:26.398094Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T21:15:44.725Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Coupa Total Spend Management Platform",
"vendor": "Coupa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "04/11/2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:coupa:coupa_total_spend_management_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "04_11_2026",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "David Sacrist\u00e1n Manzanares"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-11-04T09:31:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Tenders module of the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform. The vulnerability arises because the `list_item_function` parameter is reflected in the server\u2019s response without proper output encoding or sanitisation, and is directly embedded within the context of a JavaScript event handler. An attacker with a low-privileged account could create a malicious URL containing JavaScript payloads which, when opened by a victim, would execute arbitrary scripts within the context of the victim\u2019s browser. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform actions on the victim\u2019s behalf, disclose accessible information or manipulate the user interface."
}
],
"value": "A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Tenders module of the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform. The vulnerability arises because the `list_item_function` parameter is reflected in the server\u2019s response without proper output encoding or sanitisation, and is directly embedded within the context of a JavaScript event handler. An attacker with a low-privileged account could create a malicious URL containing JavaScript payloads which, when opened by a victim, would execute arbitrary scripts within the context of the victim\u2019s browser. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform actions on the victim\u2019s behalf, disclose accessible information or manipulate the user interface."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper neutralization of input during web page generation (\u0027cross-site scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-04T09:35:57.107Z",
"orgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516",
"shortName": "INCIBE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-coupas-total-spend-management-platform"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No solution has been reported as yet."
}
],
"value": "No solution has been reported as yet."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Multiple vulnerabilities in Coupa\u2019s Total Spend Management Platform",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516",
"assignerShortName": "INCIBE",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111037",
"datePublished": "2026-11-04T09:35:57.107Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-15T12:29:42.021Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T21:15:44.725Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Mitigation
- Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
- For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters.
- Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the:
- etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body.
- Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
- HTML body
- Element attributes (such as src="XYZ")
- URIs
- JavaScript sections
- Cascading Style Sheets and style property
Mitigation MIT-6
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-27
Strategy: Parameterization
If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Mitigation MIT-30.1
Strategy: Output Encoding
- Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component.
- The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
Mitigation MIT-43
With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
Mitigation MIT-31
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing XSS, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent XSS, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, in a chat application, the heart emoticon ("<3") would likely pass the validation step, since it is commonly used. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the web page because it contains the "<" character, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the "<" might reduce the risk of XSS, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the emoticon would not be recorded. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it would be more important in a mathematical forum that wants to represent inequalities.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
- Ensure that you perform input validation at well-defined interfaces within the application. This will help protect the application even if a component is reused or moved elsewhere.
Mitigation MIT-21
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-29
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-16
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-209: XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch
An adversary creates a file with scripting content but where the specified MIME type of the file is such that scripting is not expected. The adversary tricks the victim into accessing a URL that responds with the script file. Some browsers will detect that the specified MIME type of the file does not match the actual type of its content and will automatically switch to using an interpreter for the real content type. If the browser does not invoke script filters before doing this, the adversary's script may run on the target unsanitized, possibly revealing the victim's cookies or executing arbitrary script in their browser.
CAPEC-588: DOM-Based XSS
This type of attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where a malicious script is inserted into the client-side HTML being parsed by a web browser. Content served by a vulnerable web application includes script code used to manipulate the Document Object Model (DOM). This script code either does not properly validate input, or does not perform proper output encoding, thus creating an opportunity for an adversary to inject a malicious script launch a XSS attack. A key distinction between other XSS attacks and DOM-based attacks is that in other XSS attacks, the malicious script runs when the vulnerable web page is initially loaded, while a DOM-based attack executes sometime after the page loads. Another distinction of DOM-based attacks is that in some cases, the malicious script is never sent to the vulnerable web server at all. An attack like this is guaranteed to bypass any server-side filtering attempts to protect users.
CAPEC-591: Reflected XSS
This type of attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where a malicious script is "reflected" off a vulnerable web application and then executed by a victim's browser. The process starts with an adversary delivering a malicious script to a victim and convincing the victim to send the script to the vulnerable web application.
CAPEC-592: Stored XSS
An adversary utilizes a form of Cross-site Scripting (XSS) where a malicious script is persistently "stored" within the data storage of a vulnerable web application as valid input.
CAPEC-63: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
An adversary embeds malicious scripts in content that will be served to web browsers. The goal of the attack is for the target software, the client-side browser, to execute the script with the users' privilege level. An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute code and scripts. Web browsers, for example, have some simple security controls in place, but if a remote attacker is allowed to execute scripts (through injecting them in to user-generated content like bulletin boards) then these controls may be bypassed. Further, these attacks are very difficult for an end user to detect.
CAPEC-85: AJAX Footprinting
This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the target environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on. The knowledge gained through Ajax fingerprinting can be used to support other attacks, such as XSS.