Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
4255 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-107459 (GCVE-0-2026-107459)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-08 05:53 – Updated: 2026-10-08 13:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Openfind｜SecuShare Pro - OS Command Injection
Summary
The SecuShare Pro developed by Openfind has an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-08 13:56 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
twcert
CNA
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Openfind | SecuShare Pro |
Affected:
4
|
Date Public
2026-10-08 05:52
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-107459",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T13:56:14.160162Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T13:56:25.892Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SecuShare Pro",
"vendor": "Openfind",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-08T05:52:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe SecuShare Pro developed by Openfind has an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The SecuShare Pro developed by Openfind has an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T05:53:46.383Z",
"orgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"shortName": "twcert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-11254-9c206-1.html"
},
{
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-11255-bce41-2.html"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eCloud edition: All MailCloud (including EaaS) environments have been fully updated. The service is not affected and no further action is required.\u003cbr\u003eStandard edition: SecuShare Pro customers should contact the Openfind technical service team for assistance with the update.\u003cbr\u003eCustomized edition: Please verify the current system version and provide the version number to Openfind, who will provide the corresponding security patch.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Cloud edition: All MailCloud (including EaaS) environments have been fully updated. The service is not affected and no further action is required.\nStandard edition: SecuShare Pro customers should contact the Openfind technical service team for assistance with the update.\nCustomized edition: Please verify the current system version and provide the version number to Openfind, who will provide the corresponding security patch."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TVN-202610001",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Openfind\uff5cSecuShare Pro - OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"assignerShortName": "twcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-107459",
"datePublished": "2026-10-08T05:53:46.383Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-08T05:38:23.283Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T13:56:25.892Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-107326 (GCVE-0-2026-107326)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-29 15:16 – Updated: 2026-10-30 17:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-30 03:56 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
ibm
CNA
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7293016 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Langflow OSS |
Affected:
1.0.0 , ≤ 1.12.4
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.12.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-107326",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-30T03:56:26.389689Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T17:18:27.229Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.12.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Langflow OSS",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T15:16:30.710Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7293016"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading \u003ca href=\"https://pypi.org/project/langflow/1.12.5/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLangflow OSS to version 1.12.5.\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 - 1.12.4, follow the \u003ca href=\"https://docs.langflow.org/release-notes\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePrepare to upgrade instructions and release-specific configuration changes\u003c/a\u003e, including backing up your existing installation, then follow the \u003ca href=\"https://docs.langflow.org/get-started-installation\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLangflow OSS installation instructions\u003c/a\u003e to install version 1.12.5 and test your flows. For deployments using MCP stdio, also apply the configuration controls in Workarounds and Mitigations.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis bulletin also discloses fixes delivered in prior releases: CVE-2026-107366 was fixed in version 1.9.0; CVE-2026-18894 was fixed in version 1.11.2; and CVE-2026-77817 was fixed in version 1.11.5. Version 1.12.5 includes these fixes.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.12.5. https://pypi.org/project/langflow/1.12.5/ \n\n\n\nFor Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 - 1.12.4, follow the Prepare to upgrade instructions and release-specific configuration changes https://docs.langflow.org/release-notes , including backing up your existing installation, then follow the Langflow OSS installation instructions https://docs.langflow.org/get-started-installation to install version 1.12.5 and test your flows. For deployments using MCP stdio, also apply the configuration controls in Workarounds and Mitigations.\n\n\n\nThis bulletin also discloses fixes delivered in prior releases: CVE-2026-107366 was fixed in version 1.9.0; CVE-2026-18894 was fixed in version 1.11.2; and CVE-2026-77817 was fixed in version 1.11.5. Version 1.12.5 includes these fixes."
}
],
"title": "Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends applying the following configuration controls to deployments using MCP stdio in addition to upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.12.5. These controls do not replace the upgrade.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSet \u003ccode\u003eLANGFLOW_MCP_SERVER_INTERPRETER_HARDENING=true\u003c/code\u003e to reject direct shell-script execution, and set \u003ccode\u003eLANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY=true\u003c/code\u003e to block non-admin MCP stdio access. Restart the Langflow service after updating its environment configuration. These restrictions can require changes to existing MCP server launch configurations and limit which users can use MCP stdio.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor public workflows, retain the default restriction on custom components. Explicitly enabling \u003ccode\u003eLANGFLOW_ALLOW_PUBLIC_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS\u003c/code\u003e permits custom component execution and changes the default protection described for CVE-2026-18894.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor CVE-2026-77817, upgrading prevents the identified secret disclosure in new flow and project exports. Revoke or rotate any credentials exposed in previously exported files; upgrading does not remove secrets from copies already exported.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends applying the following configuration controls to deployments using MCP stdio in addition to upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.12.5. These controls do not replace the upgrade.\n\n\n\nSet LANGFLOW_MCP_SERVER_INTERPRETER_HARDENING=true to reject direct shell-script execution, and set LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY=true to block non-admin MCP stdio access. Restart the Langflow service after updating its environment configuration. These restrictions can require changes to existing MCP server launch configurations and limit which users can use MCP stdio.\n\n\n\nFor public workflows, retain the default restriction on custom components. Explicitly enabling LANGFLOW_ALLOW_PUBLIC_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS permits custom component execution and changes the default protection described for CVE-2026-18894.\n\n\n\nFor CVE-2026-77817, upgrading prevents the identified secret disclosure in new flow and project exports. Revoke or rotate any credentials exposed in previously exported files; upgrading does not remove secrets from copies already exported."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-107326",
"datePublished": "2026-10-29T15:16:30.710Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-07T18:05:49.456Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T17:18:27.229Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-107240 (GCVE-0-2026-107240)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-10 00:32 – Updated: 2026-11-10 00:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. The /authenticate endpoint of this service passes user-supplied username and password values to child_process.exec() through a sanitizer (escapeRegExp) that removes regular expression metacharacters but not newline characters. An unauthenticated attacker can inject a newline character into the username field to execute arbitrary shell commands as the versa OS service user. No credentials are required; the attacker needs only a CSRF token, which can be obtained from an unauthenticated page load.
Versa’s security hardening guide for Hubs, Branches, and Controllers recommends disabling the Node.js web service after the initial provisioning of the VOS device. This vulnerability is not exploitable on VOS devices where the Node.js web service has been disabled.
Severity
7.6 (High)
CWE
- CWE-78 - OS Command Injection
Assigner
hackerone
CNA
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Versa | VOS |
Affected:
21.1.1 , ≤ 21.2.3
(semver)
Affected: 22.1.2 , < July 2, 2026 (semver) Affected: 22.1.3 , < July 2, 2026 (semver) Affected: 22.1.4 , < July 2, 2026 (semver) Affected: 23.1.2 , < Aug 3, 2026 (semver) Unaffected: 22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix , < 22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix (semver) Unaffected: 22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix , < 22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix (semver) Unaffected: 22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix , < 22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix (semver) Unaffected: 23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix , < 23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "VOS",
"vendor": "Versa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "21.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "July 2, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "July 2, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "July 2, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "Aug 3, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "NCSC, Netherlands"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. The /authenticate endpoint of this service passes user-supplied username and password values to child_process.exec() through a sanitizer (escapeRegExp) that removes regular expression metacharacters but not newline characters. An unauthenticated attacker can inject a newline character into the username field to execute arbitrary shell commands as the versa OS service user. No credentials are required; the attacker needs only a CSRF token, which can be obtained from an unauthenticated page load.\u00a0\n\nVersa\u2019s security hardening guide for Hubs, Branches, and Controllers recommends disabling the Node.js web service after the initial provisioning of the VOS device. This vulnerability is not exploitable on VOS devices where the Node.js web service has been disabled."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:32:37.066Z",
"orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"shortName": "hackerone"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://security-portal.versa-networks.com/emailbulletins/6af2299bdd1c93ddc0a3e832"
}
],
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The mitigation is to disable the Nodejs web service on the VOS. Instructions to disable the Nodejs web service are available on the Versa documentation page at the below link:\n\nhttps://docs.versa-networks.com/Integrations_and_Solutions/System_Hardening/Perform_Manual_Hardening_for_Versa_Branches%2C_Controllers%2C_and_Hubs#Enable_Secure_Mode"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"assignerShortName": "hackerone",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-107240",
"datePublished": "2026-11-10T00:32:37.066Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-07T15:00:00.550Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:32:37.066Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106931 (GCVE-0-2026-106931)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 04:45 – Updated: 2026-10-21 03:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
SiteGuard Server Edition contains an OS command injection vulnerability, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with root or SYSTEM privileges on the system running the affected product.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: active
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
jpcert
CNA
References
3 references
Impacted products
5 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EG Secure Solutions Inc. | SiteGuard Server Edition for Apache httpd |
Affected:
Ver2.20 , < Ver8.00 Update 5
(semver)
|
|
| EG Secure Solutions Inc. | SiteGuard Server Edition for Nginx |
Affected:
Ver2.20 , < Ver8.00 Update 5
(semver)
|
|
| EG Secure Solutions Inc. | SiteGuard Server Edition for IIS |
Affected:
Ver2.20 , < Ver8.00 Update 5
(semver)
|
|
| EG Secure Solutions Inc. | SiteGuard Server Edition for Apache httpd on FreeBSD |
Affected:
Ver2.20 , < Ver7.00 Update 6
(semver)
|
|
| EG Secure Solutions Inc. | SiteGuard Server Edition for Nginx on FreeBSD |
Affected:
Ver2.20 , < Ver7.00 Update 6
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106931",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "active"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-20T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"dateAdded": "2026-10-20",
"reference": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-106931"
},
"type": "kev"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T03:56:27.300Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-106931"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "CVE-2026-106931 added to CISA KEV"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SiteGuard Server Edition for Apache httpd",
"vendor": "EG Secure Solutions Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Ver8.00 Update 5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Ver2.20",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SiteGuard Server Edition for Nginx",
"vendor": "EG Secure Solutions Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Ver8.00 Update 5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Ver2.20",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SiteGuard Server Edition for IIS",
"vendor": "EG Secure Solutions Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "Ver3.10",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "Ver4.00 Update 5",
"status": "affected"
}
],
"lessThan": "Ver8.00 Update 5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Ver2.20",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SiteGuard Server Edition for Apache httpd on FreeBSD",
"vendor": "EG Secure Solutions Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Ver7.00 Update 6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Ver2.20",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SiteGuard Server Edition for Nginx on FreeBSD",
"vendor": "EG Secure Solutions Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Ver7.00 Update 6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Ver2.20",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SiteGuard Server Edition contains an OS command injection vulnerability, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with root or SYSTEM privileges on the system running the affected product."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T09:09:32.417Z",
"orgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"shortName": "jpcert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.eg-secure.co.jp/siteguard/news/alert-202610-1"
},
{
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN88474777/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"assignerShortName": "jpcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106931",
"datePublished": "2026-10-14T04:45:07.678Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-07T04:50:26.138Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T03:56:27.300Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106556 (GCVE-0-2026-106556)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 14:39 – Updated: 2026-10-07 16:16
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Backstage: Configuration bypass in TechDocs mkdocs.yml sanitization
Summary
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to 1.14.6, the @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node package is affected by configuration bypass in techdocs mkdocs.yml sanitization. Insufficient validation of MkDocs configuration during TechDocs generation could allow an authenticated user who can register or modify documentation sources to execute arbitrary commands in the build environment. Impact is limited to resources accessible to the TechDocs backend or build container. This issue is fixed in versions 1.14.6 and 1.15.4.
Severity
7.7 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-07 16:15 UTC
CWE
Assigner
GitHub_M
CNA
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/251… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/b6d… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| backstage | backstage |
Affected:
< 1.50.5
Affected: >= 1.51.0-next.0, < 1.54.6 |
|
| @backstage | plugin-techdocs-node |
Affected:
< 1.14.6
Affected: >= 1.15.0, < 1.15.4 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106556",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T16:15:35.192583Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T16:16:36.009Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "backstage",
"vendor": "backstage",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.50.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.51.0-next.0, \u003c 1.54.6"
}
]
},
{
"product": "plugin-techdocs-node",
"vendor": "@backstage",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.14.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to 1.14.6, the @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node package is affected by configuration bypass in techdocs mkdocs.yml sanitization. Insufficient validation of MkDocs configuration during TechDocs generation could allow an authenticated user who can register or modify documentation sources to execute arbitrary commands in the build environment. Impact is limited to resources accessible to the TechDocs backend or build container. This issue is fixed in versions 1.14.6 and 1.15.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-184",
"description": "CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T14:39:36.015Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-g2hj-v2j6-vfvg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-g2hj-v2j6-vfvg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/25125ee727a3de3418a8fa6a9e458cd5b73ecf26",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/25125ee727a3de3418a8fa6a9e458cd5b73ecf26"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/b6d1aea0bef99b8dfec3c8746032474867ba677a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/b6d1aea0bef99b8dfec3c8746032474867ba677a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.50.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.50.5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-g2hj-v2j6-vfvg",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Backstage: Configuration bypass in TechDocs mkdocs.yml sanitization"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106556",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T14:39:36.015Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T20:31:59.016Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T16:16:36.009Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106171 (GCVE-0-2026-106171)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 17:37 – Updated: 2026-11-06 15:42
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted packets
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-14 03:59 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Escalation of privilege
Assigner
fortinet
CNA
References
1 reference
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiManager |
Affected:
8.0.0
Affected: 7.6.0 , ≤ 7.6.6 (semver) cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiManager Cloud |
Affected:
7.6.2 , ≤ 7.6.6
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106171",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-14T03:59:55.140791Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T10:51:05.093Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiManager",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiManager Cloud",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command (\u0027os command injection\u0027) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted packets"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Escalation of privilege",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T15:42:03.966Z",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-177",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-177"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to FortiManager version 8.0.1 or above\nUpgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.7 or above\nUpgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 8.0.1 or above\nUpgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.6.7 or above"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106171",
"datePublished": "2026-10-13T17:37:02.621Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T16:19:41.908Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T15:42:03.966Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106126 (GCVE-0-2026-106126)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-08 19:47 – Updated: 2026-10-08 20:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Command Injection
Summary
A command injection vulnerability in the Active Directory Events Listener of Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM on the PDCe.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-08 20:14 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
tenable
CNA
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable, Inc. | Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) |
Affected:
0 , < 3.126.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106126",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T20:14:50.276958Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T20:14:59.908Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS)",
"vendor": "Tenable, Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.126.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Takumi Ito"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A command injection vulnerability in the Active Directory Events Listener of Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM on the PDCe."
}
],
"value": "A command injection vulnerability in the Active Directory Events Listener of Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM on the PDCe."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T19:47:35.912Z",
"orgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"shortName": "tenable"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2026-27"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "To fully resolve this issue, existing installations \u003cstrong\u003emust\u003c/strong\u003e run \u003ccode\u003eRegister-TenableIOA.ps1 -Uninstall\u003c/code\u003e and reinstall the listener after upgrading. Please see the full release notes for additional instructions. (\u003ca href=\"https://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure.htm\"\u003ehttps://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure.htm\u003c/a\u003e)"
}
],
"value": "To fully resolve this issue, existing installations must run Register-TenableIOA.ps1 -Uninstall and reinstall the listener after upgrading. Please see the full release notes for additional instructions. ( https://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure.htm )"
}
],
"title": "Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"assignerShortName": "tenable",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106126",
"datePublished": "2026-10-08T19:47:35.912Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T15:41:52.906Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T20:14:59.908Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106079 (GCVE-0-2026-106079)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-28 16:37 – Updated: 2026-11-05 19:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor: Improper validation of a field causes privilege escalation when updating the YANG configuration
Summary
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in AccessManager in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor allows an attacker with config-write privileges to achieve arbitrary command execution as root in the YANG configuration.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-05 19:13 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
juniper
CNA
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112183 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Session Smart Router |
Affected:
0 , < 7.0.5
(custom)
Affected: 7.1.0 , < 7.1.7 (custom) Affected: 7.2.0 , < 7.2.3 (custom) |
|
| Juniper Networks | Session Smart Conductor |
Affected:
0 , < 7.0.5
(custom)
Affected: 7.1.0 , < 7.1.7 (custom) Affected: 7.2.0 , < 7.2.3 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-10-28 16:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106079",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T19:13:58.535283Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T19:14:12.120Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Session Smart Router",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Session Smart Conductor",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-28T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003eAn Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability\u0026nbsp;in AccessManager in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor allows an attacker with config-write privileges to achieve arbitrary command execution as root in the YANG configuration.\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability\u00a0in AccessManager in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor allows an attacker with config-write privileges to achieve arbitrary command execution as root in the YANG configuration."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:37:49.668Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112183"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The following software releases of Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor have been updated to resolve these specific issues:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e7.0.5 \n\nand all subsequent releases;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e7.1.7 \n\nand all subsequent releases;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e7.2.3 and all subsequent releases.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The following software releases of Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor have been updated to resolve these specific issues:\n * 7.0.5 \n\nand all subsequent releases;\n * 7.1.7 \n\nand all subsequent releases;\n * 7.2.3 and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA112183",
"defect": [
"I95-65021"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor: Improper validation of a field causes privilege escalation when updating the YANG configuration",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
}
],
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106079",
"datePublished": "2026-10-28T16:37:49.668Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T15:00:41.622Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T19:14:12.120Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106059 (GCVE-0-2026-106059)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 11:59 – Updated: 2026-10-10 02:20
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS Command Injection via Show in Finder AppleScript
Summary
GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS contains a command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by crafting repository filenames interpolated unescaped into the Show in Finder AppleScript. Attackers can commit a file whose path contains a double quote followed by a do shell script payload, which runs as the victim user when Show in Finder is chosen.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-10 02:20 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/663 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead | product |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-thr… | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2026-10-05 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106059",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-10T02:20:22.813539Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-10T02:20:34.299Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "gitahead",
"vendor": "gitahead",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.7.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "M.J Dhurgesh"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS contains a command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by crafting repository filenames interpolated unescaped into the Show in Finder AppleScript. Attackers can commit a file whose path contains a double quote followed by a do shell script payload, which runs as the victim user when Show in Finder is chosen."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:59:38.400Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #663",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/663"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/src/tools/ShowTool.cpp#L40-L48"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS Command Injection via Show in Finder AppleScript",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-through-2.7.1-on-macos-command-injection-via-show-in-finder-applescript"
}
],
"title": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS Command Injection via Show in Finder AppleScript",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106059",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T11:59:38.400Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T14:14:18.038Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-10T02:20:34.299Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106058 (GCVE-0-2026-106058)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 11:59 – Updated: 2026-10-07 20:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
GitAhead through 2.7.1 OS Command Injection via Git Filter Filenames
Summary
GitAhead through 2.7.1 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in src/git/Filter.cpp that allows malicious repositories to execute commands by substituting crafted filenames into clean/smudge filter commands. Attackers can ship files named with $(command) selected via .gitattributes so checkout or staging runs the command through bash -c as the victim.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-07 20:55 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/661 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead | product |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-thr… | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2026-10-04 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106058",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T20:55:31.538442Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T20:55:38.241Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/661"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "gitahead",
"vendor": "gitahead",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.7.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "M.J Dhurgesh"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in src/git/Filter.cpp that allows malicious repositories to execute commands by substituting crafted filenames into clean/smudge filter commands. Attackers can ship files named with $(command) selected via .gitattributes so checkout or staging runs the command through bash -c as the victim."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:59:37.841Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #661",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/661"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/src/git/Filter.cpp#L43-L70"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: GitAhead through 2.7.1 OS Command Injection via Git Filter Filenames",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-through-2.7.1-os-command-injection-via-git-filter-filenames"
}
],
"title": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 OS Command Injection via Git Filter Filenames",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106058",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T11:59:37.841Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T14:14:17.656Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T20:55:38.241Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.