CWE-770
AllowedAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
1853 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-89425 (GCVE-0-2026-89425)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-23 02:06 – Updated: 2026-09-23 14:00| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/securit… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/1698 | patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FasterXML | jackson-core |
Affected:
2.8.0 , ≤ 2.18.10
(maven)
Affected: 2.19.0 , ≤ 2.21.6 (maven) Affected: 2.22.0 , ≤ 2.22.2 (maven) |
|
| FasterXML | jackson-core |
Affected:
3.0.0 , ≤ 3.1.6
(maven)
Affected: 3.2.0 , ≤ 3.2.2 (maven) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89425",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-23T13:54:51.050132Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T14:00:42.979Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/security/advisories/GHSA-7hhh-6rmp-j9qf"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo1.maven.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core",
"product": "jackson-core",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json.UTF8DataInputJsonParser._reportInvalidToken"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core",
"vendor": "FasterXML",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.18.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.8.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.21.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.19.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.22.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.22.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo1.maven.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "tools.jackson.core:jackson-core",
"product": "jackson-core",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "tools.jackson.core.json.UTF8DataInputJsonParser._reportInvalidToken"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core",
"vendor": "FasterXML",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "manqingzhou"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUTF8DataInputJsonParser._reportInvalidToken() in FasterXML jackson-core builds the offending-token text for its error message by appending Java identifier characters to a StringBuilder in a loop that has no upper bound. Unlike the three sibling parser implementations, including UTF8StreamJsonParser, it never consults ErrorReportConfiguration.getMaxErrorTokenLength() (default 256). A malformed token supplied to a parser created through JsonFactory.createParser(DataInput) is therefore accumulated in full. No StreamReadConstraints setting mitigates this: maxDocumentLength cannot be applied to DataInput sources at all, and maxStringLength does not cover this path because the accumulation bypasses ReadConstrainedTextBuffer. The reporter measured a 20,000,109-character exception message from a 20-million-character malformed token on the DataInput path, against 367 characters for identical input on the InputStream path. Scaling the payload drives the StringBuilder, which also incurs byte-to-char expansion and internal array doubling, to many times the raw payload size and can trigger OutOfMemoryError for the whole JVM. UTF8DataInputJsonParser was introduced in 2.8.0 together with createParser(DataInput); releases before 2.8.0 do not contain the affected class.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "UTF8DataInputJsonParser._reportInvalidToken() in FasterXML jackson-core builds the offending-token text for its error message by appending Java identifier characters to a StringBuilder in a loop that has no upper bound. Unlike the three sibling parser implementations, including UTF8StreamJsonParser, it never consults ErrorReportConfiguration.getMaxErrorTokenLength() (default 256). A malformed token supplied to a parser created through JsonFactory.createParser(DataInput) is therefore accumulated in full. No StreamReadConstraints setting mitigates this: maxDocumentLength cannot be applied to DataInput sources at all, and maxStringLength does not cover this path because the accumulation bypasses ReadConstrainedTextBuffer. The reporter measured a 20,000,109-character exception message from a 20-million-character malformed token on the DataInput path, against 367 characters for identical input on the InputStream path. Scaling the payload drives the StringBuilder, which also incurs byte-to-char expansion and internal array doubling, to many times the raw payload size and can trigger OutOfMemoryError for the whole JVM. UTF8DataInputJsonParser was introduced in 2.8.0 together with createParser(DataInput); releases before 2.8.0 do not contain the affected class."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T02:06:10.571Z",
"orgId": "36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542c",
"shortName": "HeroDevs"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-7hhh-6rmp-j9qf",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/security/advisories/GHSA-7hhh-6rmp-j9qf"
},
{
"name": "FasterXML/jackson-core#1698",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/1698"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade to com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.18.11, 2.21.7 or 2.22.3, or to tools.jackson.core:jackson-core 3.1.7 or 3.2.3. The 2.8.x through 2.17.x, 2.19.x, 2.20.x and 3.0.x lines received no fix on their own branch and are no longer maintained upstream; consumers of those lines must move forward to a maintained release.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.18.11, 2.21.7 or 2.22.3, or to tools.jackson.core:jackson-core 3.1.7 or 3.2.3. The 2.8.x through 2.17.x, 2.19.x, 2.20.x and 3.0.x lines received no fix on their own branch and are no longer maintained upstream; consumers of those lines must move forward to a maintained release."
}
],
"title": "jackson-core: UTF8DataInputJsonParser._reportInvalidToken() does not honor maxErrorTokenLength, allowing unbounded StringBuilder growth",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eNo StreamReadConstraints or ErrorReportConfiguration setting mitigates this issue on the affected code path. Where possible, avoid JsonFactory.createParser(DataInput) for attacker-supplied content and use createParser(InputStream), createParser(Reader) or a byte-array overload instead; those parser implementations enforce maxErrorTokenLength correctly. Otherwise, bound input size ahead of the parser and cap JVM heap so that a single request cannot exhaust process memory.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "No StreamReadConstraints or ErrorReportConfiguration setting mitigates this issue on the affected code path. Where possible, avoid JsonFactory.createParser(DataInput) for attacker-supplied content and use createParser(InputStream), createParser(Reader) or a byte-array overload instead; those parser implementations enforce maxErrorTokenLength correctly. Otherwise, bound input size ahead of the parser and cap JVM heap so that a single request cannot exhaust process memory."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542c",
"assignerShortName": "HeroDevs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89425",
"datePublished": "2026-09-23T02:06:10.571Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-11T18:31:50.311Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T14:00:42.979Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-89295 (GCVE-0-2026-89295)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-03 13:30 – Updated: 2026-11-06 19:53- CWE-770 - Allocation of resources without limits or throttling
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse Mnestix |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < 1.5.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89295",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-06T19:53:33.496720Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T19:53:55.298Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse Mnestix",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Eclipse Foundation Security Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn Eclipse Mnestix AAS Generator versions 0.1.0 up until but excluding 1.5.0, a practical upper bound on the client-supplied count parameter of the GET /api/v1/IdGenerator/submodelIds/{count} and GET /api/v2/IdGenerator/submodelIds/{count} endpoints is not enforced. The service generates and retains identifiers in memory before returning a response. A remote unauthenticated attacker can submit a large count to cause excessive memory consumption, potentially resulting in denial of service. Exploitation requires network access to the endpoint and successful retrieval of the ID-generation configuration from the configured backend repository.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In Eclipse Mnestix AAS Generator versions 0.1.0 up until but excluding 1.5.0, a practical upper bound on the client-supplied count parameter of the GET /api/v1/IdGenerator/submodelIds/{count} and GET /api/v2/IdGenerator/submodelIds/{count} endpoints is not enforced. The service generates and retains identifiers in memory before returning a response. A remote unauthenticated attacker can submit a large count to cause excessive memory consumption, potentially resulting in denial of service. Exploitation requires network access to the endpoint and successful retrieval of the ID-generation configuration from the configured backend repository."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of resources without limits or throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T13:30:36.745Z",
"orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"shortName": "eclipse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/774"
},
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/303"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Unauthenticated memory-exhaustion denial of service in Eclipse Mnestix AAS Generator unbounded count parameter",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"assignerShortName": "eclipse",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89295",
"datePublished": "2026-11-03T13:30:36.745Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-11T12:51:25.114Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T19:53:55.298Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88878 (GCVE-0-2026-88878)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-10 13:05 – Updated: 2026-10-08 15:25- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advis… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/traefik-2.8.… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88878",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T14:22:22.467169Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-10T14:55:59.427Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:golang/github.com/traefik/traefik/v2",
"product": "traefik",
"vendor": "traefik",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.7.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.8.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:golang/github.com/traefik/traefik/v3",
"product": "traefik",
"vendor": "traefik",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.7.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:traefik:traefik:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "3.7.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.8.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:traefik:traefik:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "3.7.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "ShadMalloy"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. In versions \u003e= v2.8.2 through \u003c= v2.11.55 and \u003e= v3.0.0 through \u003c= v3.7.11, the entryPoints.\u003cname\u003e.transport.respondingTimeouts settings \u2014 notably readTimeout, which is enabled by default at 60s \u2014 are not applied to the HTTP/3 request path. readTimeout is enforced as a deadline on the underlying TCP connection, which cannot be applied to a QUIC stream, and Traefik\u0027s HTTP/3 server is constructed without any timeout. As a result, on entry points with HTTP/3 enabled, an unauthenticated remote client that trickles request body bytes can hold a request open indefinitely and, with it, one upstream connection per request, exhausting bounded backend connection pools and causing denial of service. The issue was introduced in v2.8.2 when a quic-go API change removed the embedded http.Server that carried these timeouts. Fixed in v2.11.56 and v3.7.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T15:25:58.415Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Traefik v2.8.2 through v3.6 HTTP/3 Timeout Bypass",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/traefik-2.8.2-through-3.6-http-3-timeout-bypass"
}
],
"title": "Traefik v2.8.2 through v3.6 HTTP/3 Timeout Bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88878",
"datePublished": "2026-09-10T13:05:30.181Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T11:24:26.196Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T15:25:58.415Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88084 (GCVE-0-2026-88084)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 20:37 – Updated: 2026-10-31 18:10- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (GDR) |
Affected:
15.0.0 , < 15.0.2200.2
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2019 for x64-based Systems (CU32) |
Affected:
15.0.4003.23 , < 15.0.4500.2
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88084",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T21:56:21.706452Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T22:06:21.601Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (GDR)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.0.2200.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2019 for x64-based Systems (CU32)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.0.4500.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.0.4003.23",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:microsoft_sql_server_2019_for_x64-based_systems_\\(cu32\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "15.0.4500.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "15.0.4003.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "15.0.2200.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "15.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-13T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-31T18:10:29.639Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Microsoft SQL Server Denial of Service Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88084"
}
],
"title": "Microsoft SQL Server Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88084",
"datePublished": "2026-10-13T20:37:23.509Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-09T21:47:30.203Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-31T18:10:29.639Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88012 (GCVE-0-2026-88012)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-10 15:35 – Updated: 2026-09-11 20:33- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13717 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/a8d0bc4… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.12 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88012",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-11T16:34:35.938612Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T20:33:29.626Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "traefik",
"vendor": "traefik",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.8.2, \u003c 2.11.56"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.0.0, \u003c 3.7.12"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 2.8.2 until 2.11.56 and 3.7.12, HTTP/3 entrypoints do not apply entryPoints..transport.respondingTimeouts.readTimeout because the timeout is enforced on a TCP connection and the HTTP/3 server has no corresponding QUIC stream deadline. An unauthenticated client can use a slow request body, trickling data indefinitely while holding a request and an upstream connection open and exhausting backends with bounded connection pools. This issue is fixed in 2.11.56 and 3.7.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-10T15:35:12.851Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13717",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13717"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/a8d0bc425859dde7481a6c9a324e610b81d754d0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/a8d0bc425859dde7481a6c9a324e610b81d754d0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.56",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.56"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.12",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.12"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Traefik: respondingTimeouts.readTimeout is not applied to HTTP/3, leaving slow-body uploads unbounded"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88012",
"datePublished": "2026-09-10T15:35:12.851Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-09T19:19:27.407Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T20:33:29.626Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-87908 (GCVE-0-2026-87908)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-11 06:37 – Updated: 2026-09-11 15:54| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| multiparty | multiparty |
Affected:
2.1.0 , < 4.3.1
(semver)
Unaffected: 4.3.1 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-87908",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-11T15:53:17.487807Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T15:54:32.991Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/multiparty",
"product": "multiparty",
"vendor": "multiparty",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.3.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Alfie Goh Li Heng"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "blakeembrey"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "multiparty is a Node.js library for parsing multipart/form-data request bodies. In versions from 2.1.0 up to but not including 4.3.1, the parser does not bound the amount of memory used while accumulating the headers of a single multipart part. An unauthenticated attacker can send a single request whose part carries a very large volume of header bytes, forcing the parser to buffer all of them and exhausting the process memory, which crashes the server. This is a denial of service with no confidentiality or integrity impact. The issue is fixed in multiparty 4.3.1, which caps the size of the accumulated part headers. Users should upgrade to multiparty 4.3.1 or later."
}
],
"value": "multiparty is a Node.js library for parsing multipart/form-data request bodies. In versions from 2.1.0 up to but not including 4.3.1, the parser does not bound the amount of memory used while accumulating the headers of a single multipart part. An unauthenticated attacker can send a single request whose part carries a very large volume of header bytes, forcing the parser to buffer all of them and exhausting the process memory, which crashes the server. This is a denial of service with no confidentiality or integrity impact. The issue is fixed in multiparty 4.3.1, which caps the size of the accumulated part headers. Users should upgrade to multiparty 4.3.1 or later."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T06:37:51.216Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/pillarjs/multiparty/security/advisories/GHSA-5h46-2939-q3wh"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "multiparty vulnerable to Denial of Service via unbounded part-header accumulation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-87908",
"datePublished": "2026-09-11T06:37:51.216Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-09T15:07:30.466Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T15:54:32.991Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-87742 (GCVE-0-2026-87742)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-17 14:57 – Updated: 2026-10-09 15:37- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69440 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69470 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-87742 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2530522 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.5.SP2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:quarkus:3.27::el8
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.3.SP2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:quarkus:3.33::el8
|
|
| Red Hat | Exploit Intelligence |
cpe:/a:redhat:exploit_intelligence:0
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-87742",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T15:19:05.994572Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T15:19:18.251Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quarkus:3.27::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "quarkus-websockets-next",
"product": "Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.5.SP2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quarkus:3.33::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "quarkus-websockets-next",
"product": "Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.3.SP2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:exploit_intelligence:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "exploit-intelligence/agent-client-rhel9",
"product": "Exploit Intelligence",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "rhelai3/bootc-gaudi-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "rhelai3/bootc-rocm-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "rhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat would like to thank Michael Read ((https://github.com/Michael-JRead)) for reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-17T13:10:22.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in quarkus-websockets-next. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by streaming messages over a single connection faster than the application can process them. Due to unbounded message buffering and a lack of read backpressure, this rapidly exhausts heap space, leading to a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError that crashes the Java Virtual Machine (JVM)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T15:37:02.180Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "RHSA-2026:69440",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69440"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2026:69470",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69470"
},
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-87742"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2530522",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2530522"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-09T05:57:34.505Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-17T13:10:22.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Quarkus-websockets-next: denial of service (oom) in quarkus-websockets-next via unbounded message buffering",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
},
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-87742",
"datePublished": "2026-09-17T14:57:44.414Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-09T05:58:00.263Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T15:37:02.180Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-87110 (GCVE-0-2026-87110)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-09 05:52 – Updated: 2026-10-13 17:01- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MongoDB | Ops Manager |
Affected:
7.0.0 , ≤ 7.0.23
(semver)
Affected: 8.0.0 , < 8.0.27 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-87110",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T15:28:06.710366Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T17:01:36.662Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Ops Manager",
"vendor": "MongoDB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.0.27",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An unauthenticated user with network access to the Ops Manager web port can repeatedly request monitoring endpoints that perform costly work without rate limiting. This can temporarily slow other traffic served by the same process while requests continue."
}
],
"value": "An unauthenticated user with network access to the Ops Manager web port can repeatedly request monitoring endpoints that perform costly work without rate limiting. This can temporarily slow other traffic served by the same process while requests continue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T05:52:14.194Z",
"orgId": "a39b4221-9bd0-4244-95fc-f3e2e07f1deb",
"shortName": "mongodb"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.mongodb.com/docs/ops-manager/current/release-notes/application/#ops-manager-server-8027"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Ops Manager Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Monitoring Endpoints",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a39b4221-9bd0-4244-95fc-f3e2e07f1deb",
"assignerShortName": "mongodb",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-87110",
"datePublished": "2026-10-09T05:52:14.194Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-08T20:30:19.603Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T17:01:36.662Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-87011 (GCVE-0-2026-87011)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-09 20:54 – Updated: 2026-09-14 13:42| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/a… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| open-webui | open-webui |
Affected:
>= 0.9.0, < 0.11.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-87011",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T13:41:36.439676Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T13:42:35.435Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "open-webui",
"vendor": "open-webui",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.9.0, \u003c 0.11.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.0 until 0.11.1, the unauthenticated POST /oauth/backchannel-logout handler in backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py fetched the OIDC discovery document and signing keys before validating a submitted logout token. Each request repeated uncached network fetches, and the signing-key lookup blocked the async event loop, so requests carrying invalid tokens could stall the single-worker instance and amplify traffic to the identity provider when ENABLE_OAUTH_BACKCHANNEL_LOGOUT was enabled. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-405",
"description": "CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-09T20:54:26.207Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/aeda6ff13a25d3b3ba1b303609f35382db22142c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/aeda6ff13a25d3b3ba1b303609f35382db22142c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-3g9q-v48f-hh9w",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Open WebUI: Unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached OIDC fetches in back-channel logout"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-87011",
"datePublished": "2026-09-09T20:54:26.207Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-08T16:44:23.783Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T13:42:35.435Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-86696 (GCVE-0-2026-86696)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-22 06:59 – Updated: 2026-10-30 18:05- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-86696.html | relatedthird-party-advisory |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-86696 | related |
| https://github.com/handnot2/esaml/commit/be692b56… | related |
| https://github.com/arekinath/esaml/commit/be692b5… | related |
| https://github.com/dropbox/esaml/commit/be692b562… | relatedbroken-link |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| handnot2 | esaml |
Affected:
be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96 , < *
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:handnot2:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| arekinath | esaml |
Affected:
be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96 , < *
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:arekinath:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| dropbox | esaml |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < *
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:dropbox:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| dropbox | esaml |
Affected:
be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96 , < *
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:dropbox:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-86696",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-30T18:05:24.637835Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T18:05:53.388Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-86696.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-86696"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:handnot2:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"esaml",
"esaml_sp",
"esaml_cowboy"
],
"packageName": "handnot2/esaml",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/handnot2/esaml",
"product": "esaml",
"programFiles": [
"src/esaml.erl",
"src/esaml_sp.erl",
"src/esaml_cowboy.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "esaml:status_code_map/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml:decode_logout_response/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2"
},
{
"name": "esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/handnot2/esaml",
"vendor": "handnot2",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:arekinath:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"esaml",
"esaml_sp",
"esaml_cowboy"
],
"packageName": "arekinath/esaml",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/arekinath/esaml",
"product": "esaml",
"programFiles": [
"src/esaml.erl",
"src/esaml_sp.erl",
"src/esaml_cowboy.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "esaml:status_code_map/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml:decode_logout_response/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2"
},
{
"name": "esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/arekinath/esaml",
"vendor": "arekinath",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:dropbox:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"esaml",
"esaml_sp",
"esaml_cowboy"
],
"packageName": "esaml",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/esaml",
"product": "esaml",
"programFiles": [
"src/esaml.erl",
"src/esaml_sp.erl",
"src/esaml_cowboy.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "esaml:status_code_map/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml:decode_logout_response/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2"
},
{
"name": "esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/dropbox/esaml",
"vendor": "dropbox",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:dropbox:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"esaml",
"esaml_sp",
"esaml_cowboy"
],
"packageName": "dropbox/esaml",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/dropbox/esaml",
"product": "esaml",
"programFiles": [
"src/esaml.erl",
"src/esaml_sp.erl",
"src/esaml_cowboy.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "esaml:status_code_map/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml:decode_logout_response/1"
},
{
"name": "esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2"
},
{
"name": "esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/dropbox/esaml",
"vendor": "dropbox",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReachable only where the service provider exposes a single-logout endpoint that hands incoming \u003ccode\u003eLogoutResponse\u003c/code\u003e messages to \u003ccode\u003eesaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2\u003c/code\u003e, directly or through \u003ccode\u003eesaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2\u003c/code\u003e. The consume (ACS) path verifies signatures before decoding and does not reach the status code mapping.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Reachable only where the service provider exposes a single-logout endpoint that hands incoming `LogoutResponse` messages to `esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2`, directly or through `esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2`. The consume (ACS) path verifies signatures before decoding and does not reach the status code mapping."
}
],
"value": "Reachable only where the service provider exposes a single-logout endpoint that hands incoming LogoutResponse messages to esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2, directly or through esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2. The consume (ACS) path verifies signatures before decoding and does not reach the status code mapping."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:handnot2:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:dropbox:esaml:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Quinn Wilton"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Quinn Wilton"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2026-10-08T14:39:37.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in \u003ccode\u003eesaml\u003c/code\u003e in dropbox esaml allows an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust the Erlang VM atom table and crash the node via unsigned \u003ccode\u003eLogoutResponse\u003c/code\u003e messages.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003eesaml:status_code_map/1\u003c/code\u003e in \u003ccode\u003esrc/esaml.erl\u003c/code\u003e maps any \u003ccode\u003eStatusCode\u003c/code\u003e value it does not recognize to an atom with \u003ccode\u003elist_to_atom/1\u003c/code\u003e on the last colon-separated segment of the URN. \u003ccode\u003eesaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2\u003c/code\u003e verifies a signature only when the message carries one, so an unsigned \u003ccode\u003eLogoutResponse\u003c/code\u003e posted to the single-logout endpoint reaches \u003ccode\u003eesaml:decode_logout_response/1\u003c/code\u003e and mints one permanent atom per distinct status value. Atoms are never reclaimed and the VM caps the atom table at about one million entries, so an attacker who posts that many distinct values aborts the node.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects esaml: from 0.1.0 onward.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in `esaml` in dropbox esaml allows an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust the Erlang VM atom table and crash the node via unsigned `LogoutResponse` messages.\n\n`esaml:status_code_map/1` in `src/esaml.erl` maps any `StatusCode` value it does not recognize to an atom with `list_to_atom/1` on the last colon-separated segment of the URN. `esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2` verifies a signature only when the message carries one, so an unsigned `LogoutResponse` posted to the single-logout endpoint reaches `esaml:decode_logout_response/1` and mints one permanent atom per distinct status value. Atoms are never reclaimed and the VM caps the atom table at about one million entries, so an attacker who posts that many distinct values aborts the node.\n\nThis issue affects esaml: from 0.1.0 onward."
}
],
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in esaml in dropbox esaml allows an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust the Erlang VM atom table and crash the node via unsigned LogoutResponse messages.\n\nesaml:status_code_map/1 in src/esaml.erl maps any StatusCode value it does not recognize to an atom with list_to_atom/1 on the last colon-separated segment of the URN. esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2 verifies a signature only when the message carries one, so an unsigned LogoutResponse posted to the single-logout endpoint reaches esaml:decode_logout_response/1 and mints one permanent atom per distinct status value. Atoms are never reclaimed and the VM caps the atom table at about one million entries, so an attacker who posts that many distinct values aborts the node.\n\nThis issue affects esaml: from 0.1.0 onward."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-125",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated attacker posts unsigned \u003ccode\u003eLogoutResponse\u003c/code\u003e messages with distinct status code URNs to a service provider\u0027s single-logout endpoint. Each message permanently consumes one atom table entry, and about one million of them abort the Erlang VM, denying service to every user of the service provider.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "An unauthenticated attacker posts unsigned `LogoutResponse` messages with distinct status code URNs to a service provider\u0027s single-logout endpoint. Each message permanently consumes one atom table entry, and about one million of them abort the Erlang VM, denying service to every user of the service provider."
}
],
"value": "An unauthenticated attacker posts unsigned LogoutResponse messages with distinct status code URNs to a service provider\u0027s single-logout endpoint. Each message permanently consumes one atom table entry, and about one million of them abort the Erlang VM, denying service to every user of the service provider."
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-22T06:59:07.680Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-86696",
"tags": [
"related",
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-86696.html"
},
{
"name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-86696",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-86696"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit be692b5 in handnot2/esaml",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handnot2/esaml/commit/be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit be692b5 in arekinath/esaml",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/arekinath/esaml/commit/be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit be692b5 in dropbox/esaml",
"tags": [
"related",
"broken-link"
],
"url": "https://github.com/dropbox/esaml/commit/be692b56245071899757afa7ef47e43593d3de96"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Unbounded atom creation from unsigned LogoutResponse status codes in esaml allows atom table exhaustion",
"x_proofOfConcept": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBuild an unsigned \u003ccode\u003esamlp:LogoutResponse\u003c/code\u003e document with \u003ccode\u003eVersion=\"2.0\"\u003c/code\u003e, any \u003ccode\u003eIssueInstant\u003c/code\u003e, and a \u003ccode\u003esamlp:Status/samlp:StatusCode\u003c/code\u003e whose \u003ccode\u003eValue\u003c/code\u003e is a fresh URN such as \u003ccode\u003eurn:x:\u0026lt;unique token\u0026gt;\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeflate and base64-encode it, and post it to the service provider\u0027s single-logout endpoint as the \u003ccode\u003eSAMLResponse\u003c/code\u003e form field with \u003ccode\u003eSAMLEncoding\u003c/code\u003e set to the DEFLATE URI.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ccode\u003eesaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2\u003c/code\u003e skips signature verification because none is present, \u003ccode\u003eesaml:decode_logout_response/1\u003c/code\u003e maps the status through \u003ccode\u003estatus_code_map/1\u003c/code\u003e, and the atom table grows by one entry per distinct token. The endpoint answers with an error, but the atom is never reclaimed. Repeat with fresh tokens until the VM aborts.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "1. Build an unsigned `samlp:LogoutResponse` document with `Version=\"2.0\"`, any `IssueInstant`, and a `samlp:Status/samlp:StatusCode` whose `Value` is a fresh URN such as `urn:x:\u003cunique token\u003e`.\n2. Deflate and base64-encode it, and post it to the service provider\u0027s single-logout endpoint as the `SAMLResponse` form field with `SAMLEncoding` set to the DEFLATE URI.\n3. `esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2` skips signature verification because none is present, `esaml:decode_logout_response/1` maps the status through `status_code_map/1`, and the atom table grows by one entry per distinct token. The endpoint answers with an error, but the atom is never reclaimed. Repeat with fresh tokens until the VM aborts."
}
],
"value": "* Build an unsigned samlp:LogoutResponse document with Version=\"2.0\", any IssueInstant, and a samlp:Status/samlp:StatusCode whose Value is a fresh URN such as urn:x:\u003cunique token\u003e.\n* Deflate and base64-encode it, and post it to the service provider\u0027s single-logout endpoint as the SAMLResponse form field with SAMLEncoding set to the DEFLATE URI.\n* esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2 skips signature verification because none is present, esaml:decode_logout_response/1 maps the status through status_code_map/1, and the atom table grows by one entry per distinct token. The endpoint answers with an error, but the atom is never reclaimed. Repeat with fresh tokens until the VM aborts."
}
],
"x_technicalAnalysis": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1. Input.\u003c/strong\u003e The single-logout endpoint in \u003ccode\u003eesaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2\u003c/code\u003e reads the request body, decodes the \u003ccode\u003eSAMLResponse\u003c/code\u003e form field with \u003ccode\u003eesaml_binding:decode_response/2\u003c/code\u003e, and passes a \u003ccode\u003esamlp:LogoutResponse\u003c/code\u003e document to \u003ccode\u003eesaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. No signature required.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003ccode\u003evalidate_logout_response/2\u003c/code\u003e looks for a \u003ccode\u003eds:Signature\u003c/code\u003e element and verifies it only when one is present. An unsigned document passes through unchanged to \u003ccode\u003eesaml:decode_logout_response/1\u003c/code\u003e, which requires only the \u003ccode\u003eVersion\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003eIssueInstant\u003c/code\u003e attributes before mapping the \u003ccode\u003eStatusCode\u003c/code\u003e value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3. Interning.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003ccode\u003eesaml:status_code_map/1\u003c/code\u003e matches six known SAML status URNs to fixed atoms. Any other value starting with \u003ccode\u003eurn:\u003c/code\u003e falls through to a clause that interns the last colon-separated segment with \u003ccode\u003elist_to_atom/1\u003c/code\u003e. The attacker chooses that segment, so each request with a fresh value mints one permanent atom. The VM aborts when the atom table reaches its limit of about one million entries.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "**1. Input.** The single-logout endpoint in `esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2` reads the request body, decodes the `SAMLResponse` form field with `esaml_binding:decode_response/2`, and passes a `samlp:LogoutResponse` document to `esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2`.\n\n**2. No signature required.** `validate_logout_response/2` looks for a `ds:Signature` element and verifies it only when one is present. An unsigned document passes through unchanged to `esaml:decode_logout_response/1`, which requires only the `Version` and `IssueInstant` attributes before mapping the `StatusCode` value.\n\n**3. Interning.** `esaml:status_code_map/1` matches six known SAML status URNs to fixed atoms. Any other value starting with `urn:` falls through to a clause that interns the last colon-separated segment with `list_to_atom/1`. The attacker chooses that segment, so each request with a fresh value mints one permanent atom. The VM aborts when the atom table reaches its limit of about one million entries."
}
],
"value": "1. Input. The single-logout endpoint in esaml_cowboy:validate_logout/2 reads the request body, decodes the SAMLResponse form field with esaml_binding:decode_response/2, and passes a samlp:LogoutResponse document to esaml_sp:validate_logout_response/2.\n\n2. No signature required. validate_logout_response/2 looks for a ds:Signature element and verifies it only when one is present. An unsigned document passes through unchanged to esaml:decode_logout_response/1, which requires only the Version and IssueInstant attributes before mapping the StatusCode value.\n\n3. Interning. esaml:status_code_map/1 matches six known SAML status URNs to fixed atoms. Any other value starting with urn: falls through to a clause that interns the last colon-separated segment with list_to_atom/1. The attacker chooses that segment, so each request with a fresh value mints one permanent atom. The VM aborts when the atom table reaches its limit of about one million entries."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-86696",
"datePublished": "2026-10-22T06:59:07.680Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-08T13:45:02.138Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T18:05:53.388Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Mitigation
Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Mitigation
Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation MIT-38.1
- If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
- Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Mitigation MIT-47
Strategy: Resource Limitation
- Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
- When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
- Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
CAPEC-125: Flooding
An adversary consumes the resources of a target by rapidly engaging in a large number of interactions with the target. This type of attack generally exposes a weakness in rate limiting or flow. When successful this attack prevents legitimate users from accessing the service and can cause the target to crash. This attack differs from resource depletion through leaks or allocations in that the latter attacks do not rely on the volume of requests made to the target but instead focus on manipulation of the target's operations. The key factor in a flooding attack is the number of requests the adversary can make in a given period of time. The greater this number, the more likely an attack is to succeed against a given target.
CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
An adversary causes the target to allocate excessive resources to servicing the attackers' request, thereby reducing the resources available for legitimate services and degrading or denying services. Usually, this attack focuses on memory allocation, but any finite resource on the target could be the attacked, including bandwidth, processing cycles, or other resources. This attack does not attempt to force this allocation through a large number of requests (that would be Resource Depletion through Flooding) but instead uses one or a small number of requests that are carefully formatted to force the target to allocate excessive resources to service this request(s). Often this attack takes advantage of a bug in the target to cause the target to allocate resources vastly beyond what would be needed for a normal request.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-197: Exponential Data Expansion
An adversary submits data to a target application which contains nested exponential data expansion to produce excessively large output. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. However, this capability can be abused to create excessive demands on a processor's CPU and memory. A small number of nested expansions can result in an exponential growth in demands on memory.
CAPEC-229: Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
This attack exploits certain serialized data parsers (e.g., XML, YAML, etc.) which manage data in an inefficient manner. The attacker crafts an serialized data file with multiple configuration parameters in the same dataset. In a vulnerable parser, this results in a denial of service condition where CPU resources are exhausted because of the parsing algorithm. The weakness being exploited is tied to parser implementation and not language specific.
CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.
CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.
CAPEC-469: HTTP DoS
An attacker performs flooding at the HTTP level to bring down only a particular web application rather than anything listening on a TCP/IP connection. This denial of service attack requires substantially fewer packets to be sent which makes DoS harder to detect. This is an equivalent of SYN flood in HTTP. The idea is to keep the HTTP session alive indefinitely and then repeat that hundreds of times. This attack targets resource depletion weaknesses in web server software. The web server will wait to attacker's responses on the initiated HTTP sessions while the connection threads are being exhausted.
CAPEC-482: TCP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the TCP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service. These attacks exploit the weakness within the TCP protocol where there is some state information for the connection the server needs to maintain. This often involves the use of TCP SYN messages.
CAPEC-486: UDP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the UDP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. Additionally, firewalls often open a port for each UDP connection destined for a service with an open UDP port, meaning the firewalls in essence save the connection state thus the high packet nature of a UDP flood can also overwhelm resources allocated to the firewall. UDP attacks can also target services like DNS or VoIP which utilize these protocols. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the UDP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-487: ICMP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the ICMP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. A typical attack involves a victim server receiving ICMP packets at a high rate from a wide range of source addresses. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the ICMP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-488: HTTP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the HTTP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming resources at the application layer such as web services and their infrastructure. These attacks use legitimate session-based HTTP GET requests designed to consume large amounts of a server's resources. Since these are legitimate sessions this attack is very difficult to detect.
CAPEC-489: SSL Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the SSL protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming all the available resources on the server side. These attacks take advantage of the asymmetric relationship between the processing power used by the client and the processing power used by the server to create a secure connection. In this manner the attacker can make a large number of HTTPS requests on a low provisioned machine to tie up a disproportionately large number of resources on the server. The clients then continue to keep renegotiating the SSL connection. When multiplied by a large number of attacking machines, this attack can result in a crash or loss of service to legitimate users.
CAPEC-490: Amplification
An adversary may execute an amplification where the size of a response is far greater than that of the request that generates it. The goal of this attack is to use a relatively few resources to create a large amount of traffic against a target server. To execute this attack, an adversary send a request to a 3rd party service, spoofing the source address to be that of the target server. The larger response that is generated by the 3rd party service is then sent to the target server. By sending a large number of initial requests, the adversary can generate a tremendous amount of traffic directed at the target. The greater the discrepancy in size between the initial request and the final payload delivered to the target increased the effectiveness of this attack.
CAPEC-491: Quadratic Data Expansion
An adversary exploits macro-like substitution to cause a denial of service situation due to excessive memory being allocated to fully expand the data. The result of this denial of service could cause the application to freeze or crash. This involves defining a very large entity and using it multiple times in a single entity substitution. CAPEC-197 is a similar attack pattern, but it is easier to discover and defend against. This attack pattern does not perform multi-level substitution and therefore does not obviously appear to consume extensive resources.
CAPEC-493: SOAP Array Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a web service that uses SOAP messages in communication. By sending a very large SOAP array declaration to the web service, the attacker forces the web service to allocate space for the array elements before they are parsed by the XML parser. The attacker message is typically small in size containing a large array declaration of say 1,000,000 elements and a couple of array elements. This attack targets exhaustion of the memory resources of the web service.
CAPEC-494: TCP Fragmentation
An adversary may execute a TCP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of avoiding filtering rules of network controls, by attempting to fragment the TCP packet such that the headers flag field is pushed into the second fragment which typically is not filtered.
CAPEC-495: UDP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a UDP Fragmentation attack against a target server in an attempt to consume resources such as bandwidth and CPU. IP fragmentation occurs when an IP datagram is larger than the MTU of the route the datagram has to traverse. Typically the attacker will use large UDP packets over 1500 bytes of data which forces fragmentation as ethernet MTU is 1500 bytes. This attack is a variation on a typical UDP flood but it enables more network bandwidth to be consumed with fewer packets. Additionally it has the potential to consume server CPU resources and fill memory buffers associated with the processing and reassembling of fragmented packets.
CAPEC-496: ICMP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a ICMP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of consuming resources or causing a crash. The attacker crafts a large number of identical fragmented IP packets containing a portion of a fragmented ICMP message. The attacker these sends these messages to a target host which causes the host to become non-responsive. Another vector may be sending a fragmented ICMP message to a target host with incorrect sizes in the header which causes the host to hang.
CAPEC-528: XML Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using XML messages with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a web service. These attacks are accomplished by sending a large number of XML based requests and letting the service attempt to parse each one. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a XML Denial of Service (XDoS) due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crashing.