CWE-697

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-91851",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-15T13:29:22.086413Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T13:29:55.108Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "DashboardsController"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/DashboardsController.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.46",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAffected versions of MISP incorrectly filter dashboard templates that are restricted to a specific permission flag.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003eDashboardsController::listTemplates()\u003c/code\u003e allowed a template when either:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;its \u003ccode\u003erestrict_to_permission_flag\u003c/code\u003e matched one of the current user\u2019s permission flags, or\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;\u003ccode\u003erestrict_to_permission_flag\u003c/code\u003e equaled integer \u003ccode\u003e0\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ccode\u003e\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003e\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, \u003ccode\u003erestrict_to_permission_flag\u003c/code\u003e is a \u003ccode\u003evarchar\u003c/code\u003e. MySQL therefore performed numeric coercion when comparing the column against integer \u003ccode\u003e0\u003c/code\u003e. Strings such as \u003ccode\u003eperm_site_admin\u003c/code\u003e convert numerically to zero, making expressions such as \u003ccode\u003eperm_site_admin = 0\u003c/code\u003e evaluate true and causing the \u201cunrestricted\u201d branch to match permission-restricted templates as well.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eVersion affected: \u22642.5.45\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Affected versions of MISP incorrectly filter dashboard templates that are restricted to a specific permission flag.\n\n\nDashboardsController::listTemplates() allowed a template when either:\n\n\n\n\u2003-\u00a0its restrict_to_permission_flag matched one of the current user\u2019s permission flags, or\n\n\u2003-\u00a0restrict_to_permission_flag equaled integer 0\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHowever, restrict_to_permission_flag is a varchar. MySQL therefore performed numeric coercion when comparing the column against integer 0. Strings such as perm_site_admin convert numerically to zero, making expressions such as perm_site_admin = 0 evaluate true and causing the \u201cunrestricted\u201d branch to match permission-restricted templates as well.\n\n\n\nVersion affected: \u22642.5.45"
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697 Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T08:50:01.513Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/245b8d63a"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix corrects the type mismatch in the permission flag comparison by replacing the integer literal 0 with the explicit string values \u0027\u0027 and \u00270\u0027, which are the actual database values representing an unrestricted dashboard template. This ensures MySQL performs a proper string-to-string comparison, so only rows genuinely marked as unrestricted are returned, restoring the intended per-permission-level access control on dashboard templates.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix corrects the type mismatch in the permission flag comparison by replacing the integer literal 0 with the explicit string values \u0027\u0027 and \u00270\u0027, which are the actual database values representing an unrestricted dashboard template. This ensures MySQL performs a proper string-to-string comparison, so only rows genuinely marked as unrestricted are returned, restoring the intended per-permission-level access control on dashboard templates."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP Dashboard Template ACL Bypass Due to VARCHAR-to-Integer Type Coercion in Permission Flag Comparison",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "review",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.46 with 200 commits after fix); no explicit affected or fixed version is stated in the patch metadata.",
                  "The vulnerability requires an authenticated MISP user with any role; the exact minimum privilege level needed to access the listTemplates endpoint is not specified in the patch.",
                  "The impact is assessed as Low confidentiality because the disclosed data is dashboard template definitions (layout, widget configuration) rather than raw threat intelligence or user credentials.",
                  "The MySQL type-coercion behavior described in the commit message and code comments is assumed to be accurate for the MySQL versions supported by MISP."
                ],
                "commit": "245b8d63a3794d048fb88275512fa0d32981f0b8",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "The vulnerability is exploitable over the network (AV:N) via the MISP web interface with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no attack target manipulation (AT:N). It requires a low-privilege authenticated user (PR:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). The impact is limited to confidentiality (VC:L) as restricted dashboard template definitions are disclosed to unauthorized users; there is no integrity or availability impact (VI:N, VA:N) and no secondary effects (SC:N, SI:N, SA:N). The severity is moderate because the disclosed data is dashboard template metadata rather than raw threat intelligence, but it still represents a breach of the intended access control boundary.",
                "draft": false,
                "fixSummary": "The fix corrects the type mismatch in the permission flag comparison by replacing the integer literal 0 with the explicit string values \u0027\u0027 and \u00270\u0027, which are the actual database values representing an unrestricted dashboard template. This ensures MySQL performs a proper string-to-string comparison, so only rows genuinely marked as unrestricted are returned, restoring the intended per-permission-level access control on dashboard templates.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-15T08:40:44.690048Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 4,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 6
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "ac03cd1103d5fb0998c2406836df41d3449e5a5d6a0a5d2ffc77685eba48e188",
                "patchSummary": "In app/Controller/DashboardsController.php, the listTemplates() method\u0027s query condition was changed from [\u0027Dashboard.restrict_to_permission_flag\u0027 =\u003e 0] to [\u0027Dashboard.restrict_to_permission_flag\u0027 =\u003e [\u0027\u0027, \u00270\u0027]]. A multi-line comment was added explaining that restrict_to_permission_flag is a VARCHAR column and that comparing it to integer 0 causes MySQL to coerce the column, making the clause a no-op. The two values that actually represent unrestricted access are the empty string (column default) and the string \u00270\u0027 (posted by the save form).",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "245b8d63a3794d048fb88275512fa0d32981f0b8",
                    "patchSha256": "ac03cd1103d5fb0998c2406836df41d3449e5a5d6a0a5d2ffc77685eba48e188",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/245b8d63a.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/245b8d63a.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [acl] Compare the dashboard template permission flag as"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/245b8d63a.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [acl] Compare the dashboard template permission flag as",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 200,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.46",
                  "version": "2.5.46",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-863",
                    "rationale": "The permission-based filter on dashboard templates was effectively bypassed because the type-coerced comparison matched all rows, allowing any authenticated user to access templates restricted to higher-privilege roles. The authorization check was present in code but did not function correctly."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-697",
                    "rationale": "The root cause is a comparison between a VARCHAR column and an integer literal. MySQL\u0027s implicit type coercion caused the comparison to evaluate to TRUE for all non-numeric string values, making the intended filter a no-op. This is a classic incorrect comparison due to type mismatch."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20010"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-91851",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-15T08:50:01.513Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-15T08:49:59.734Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T13:29:55.108Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-90711",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-15T14:46:09.894513Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T14:48:38.703Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/proxy-addr",
          "product": "proxy-addr",
          "vendor": "proxy-addr",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.0.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "2.0.8",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "kagebunsher"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "UlisesGascon"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "kustundag"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "proxy-addr is a Node.js module that determines a request\u0027s client address behind trusted reverse proxies, and it backs Express req.ip and req.ips. In versions 1.1.0 through 2.0.7, a trust subnet written in IPv4-mapped IPv6 notation with an IPv4-sized prefix, such as ::ffff:10.0.0.0/8 instead of the correct ::ffff:10.0.0.0/104, is accepted without error but trusts every IPv4 address on the internet rather than the block it names. Because the socket peer then becomes trusted at hop 0, any unauthenticated client can supply an arbitrary X-Forwarded-For header and control the address the application reads, which defeats IP-based access control, rate limiting, geolocation, and audit logging. This is a fail-open regression introduced in version 1.1.0. The issue is fixed in proxy-addr 2.0.8, and users should upgrade to 2.0.8 or later. As a workaround, ensure any IPv4-mapped IPv6 trust subnet uses a prefix length of at least 97, or express the range in plain IPv4 notation."
            }
          ],
          "value": "proxy-addr is a Node.js module that determines a request\u0027s client address behind trusted reverse proxies, and it backs Express req.ip and req.ips. In versions 1.1.0 through 2.0.7, a trust subnet written in IPv4-mapped IPv6 notation with an IPv4-sized prefix, such as ::ffff:10.0.0.0/8 instead of the correct ::ffff:10.0.0.0/104, is accepted without error but trusts every IPv4 address on the internet rather than the block it names. Because the socket peer then becomes trusted at hop 0, any unauthenticated client can supply an arbitrary X-Forwarded-For header and control the address the application reads, which defeats IP-based access control, rate limiting, geolocation, and audit logging. This is a fail-open regression introduced in version 1.1.0. The issue is fixed in proxy-addr 2.0.8, and users should upgrade to 2.0.8 or later. As a workaround, ensure any IPv4-mapped IPv6 trust subnet uses a prefix length of at least 97, or express the range in plain IPv4 notation."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 9.1,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-290",
              "description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-348",
              "description": "CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T06:19:46.332Z",
        "orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "shortName": "openjs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/jshttp/proxy-addr/security/advisories/GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "proxy-addr vulnerable to IP spoofing via IPv4-mapped IPv6 trust subnet",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
    "assignerShortName": "openjs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-90711",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-15T06:19:46.332Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-13T09:18:12.590Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T14:48:38.703Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-85292",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T16:19:53.690399Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T16:20:09.584Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "InvoicePlane",
          "vendor": "InvoicePlane",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.7.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "InvoicePlane is a self-hosted open source application for managing invoices, clients, and payments. Prior to 1.7.2, InvoicePlane\u0027s User_Controller compares the session user_type value with the required role by using PHP\u0027s loose inequality operator. Under a non-standard session backend that returns unexpected scalar types, type juggling can cause a value that is not strictly the required role to pass the authorization check. This can permit authentication or authorization bypass in affected session configurations. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T15:25:26.805Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/security/advisories/GHSA-346c-gqqq-mrm2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/security/advisories/GHSA-346c-gqqq-mrm2"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/pull/1640",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/pull/1640"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/commit/efa9f576faa93ba64bef52b09b119e81a5b22fcf",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/commit/efa9f576faa93ba64bef52b09b119e81a5b22fcf"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/releases/tag/v1.7.2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InvoicePlane/InvoicePlane/releases/tag/v1.7.2"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-346c-gqqq-mrm2",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "InvoicePlane: Loose Type Comparison in Core Authentication Check (Defense-in-Depth)"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-85292",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T15:25:26.805Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-03T16:37:49.262Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T16:20:09.584Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-80227",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-31T14:56:28.428746Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T14:56:51.710Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql/security/advisories/GHSA-76wx-w7ww-5xfq"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_sql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.AshSql.Expr\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "ash_sql",
          "packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_sql",
          "product": "ash_sql",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/expr.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshSql.Expr\u0027:do_dynamic_expr/6"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql",
          "vendor": "ash-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_sql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.AshSql.Expr\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "ash-project/ash_sql",
          "packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_sql",
          "product": "ash_sql",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/expr.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshSql.Expr\u0027:do_dynamic_expr/6"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql",
          "vendor": "ash-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1b11b5d8bc5321e2e6acac21594ef08f61986117",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "dd092ed273dec7bd2194352f24a39229fc8ae68b",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eAn application must use \u003ccode\u003estring_trim/1\u003c/code\u003e in a filter, validation, calculation, or identity that an attacker-influenced string field flows through, where the trimmed value is compared for equality or uniqueness.\u003c/p\u003e"
            },
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/markdown",
              "value": "An application must use `string_trim/1` in a filter, validation, calculation, or identity that an attacker-influenced string field flows through, where the trimmed value is compared for equality or uniqueness."
            }
          ],
          "value": "An application must use string_trim/1 in a filter, validation, calculation, or identity that an attacker-influenced string field flows through, where the trimmed value is compared for equality or uniqueness."
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_sql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "0.7.1",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "AND"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Peter Ullrich"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Peter Ullrich"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIncorrect Comparison vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a user to pad a string field with tab, newline, carriage-return, or form-feed characters and pass a trimmed uniqueness or equality check in the database that the same expression would fail in memory (or the reverse).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003estring_trim/1\u003c/code\u003e compiles to \u003ccode\u003eREGEXP_REPLACE\u003c/code\u003e patterns built from an Elixir string in which \u003ccode\u003e\\s\u003c/code\u003e is the escape for a single space (codepoint 32), not a regex whitespace class. The generated SQL therefore removes only literal spaces and leaves tabs, newlines, carriage returns, and form feeds in place, whereas \u003ccode\u003eString.trim/1\u003c/code\u003e in Elixir removes them all. Any Ash filter, validation, or identity that relies on \u003ccode\u003estring_trim/1\u003c/code\u003e then behaves differently depending on whether Ash pushes the expression down to SQL or evaluates it in memory, so padded input can register a near-duplicate value or slip past a trimmed comparison.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.\u003c/p\u003e"
            },
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/markdown",
              "value": "Incorrect Comparison vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a user to pad a string field with tab, newline, carriage-return, or form-feed characters and pass a trimmed uniqueness or equality check in the database that the same expression would fail in memory (or the reverse).\n\n`string_trim/1` compiles to `REGEXP_REPLACE` patterns built from an Elixir string in which `\\s` is the escape for a single space (codepoint 32), not a regex whitespace class. The generated SQL therefore removes only literal spaces and leaves tabs, newlines, carriage returns, and form feeds in place, whereas `String.trim/1` in Elixir removes them all. Any Ash filter, validation, or identity that relies on `string_trim/1` then behaves differently depending on whether Ash pushes the expression down to SQL or evaluates it in memory, so padded input can register a near-duplicate value or slip past a trimmed comparison.\n\nThis issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Incorrect Comparison vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a user to pad a string field with tab, newline, carriage-return, or form-feed characters and pass a trimmed uniqueness or equality check in the database that the same expression would fail in memory (or the reverse).\n\nstring_trim/1 compiles to REGEXP_REPLACE patterns built from an Elixir string in which \\s is the escape for a single space (codepoint 32), not a regex whitespace class. The generated SQL therefore removes only literal spaces and leaves tabs, newlines, carriage returns, and form feeds in place, whereas String.trim/1 in Elixir removes them all. Any Ash filter, validation, or identity that relies on string_trim/1 then behaves differently depending on whether Ash pushes the expression down to SQL or evaluates it in memory, so padded input can register a near-duplicate value or slip past a trimmed comparison.\n\nThis issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-3",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-3 Using Leading \u0027Ghost\u0027 Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 2.1,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697 Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-30T11:53:35.548Z",
        "orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
        "shortName": "EEF"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql/security/advisories/GHSA-76wx-w7ww-5xfq"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-80227.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-80227"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql/commit/1b11b5d8bc5321e2e6acac21594ef08f61986117"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "SQL string_trim removes only spaces, diverging from in-memory trimming in AshSql"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
    "assignerShortName": "EEF",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-80227",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-30T11:53:35.548Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-30T05:45:01.813Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T14:56:51.710Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-79913",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T17:33:06.764833Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T17:44:01.258Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "cloudreve",
          "vendor": "cloudreve",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 4.18.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.18.0, the ValidateExternalURL server-side request forgery guard in pkg/request/ssrf.go passes resolved addresses to checkIP without decoding NAT64, IPv4-compatible, and 6to4 IPv4-in-IPv6 transition forms. An authenticated user with remote-download access can provide SrcUri through RemoteDownloadTask.createDownloadTask so a wrapper embedding a loopback, private, link-local, or cloud metadata IPv4 address is classified as public and fetched, exposing internal service responses and cloud instance credentials. IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses remain blocked because Go converts that form with net.IP.To4. This issue is fixed in version 4.18.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:24:33.456Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cloudreve/cloudreve/security/advisories/GHSA-jvh5-97xg-v99f",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cloudreve/cloudreve/security/advisories/GHSA-jvh5-97xg-v99f"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cloudreve/cloudreve/commit/1c5cad6dec7ec3037c6479e3a26a3909995d16a2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cloudreve/cloudreve/commit/1c5cad6dec7ec3037c6479e3a26a3909995d16a2"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cloudreve/cloudreve/releases/tag/4.18.0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cloudreve/cloudreve/releases/tag/4.18.0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-jvh5-97xg-v99f",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Cloudreve: SSRF guard bypass: checkIP does not decode IPv6-transition wrappers (NAT64, IPv4-compatible, 6to4) reaching internal and cloud-metadata addresses"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-79913",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T15:24:33.456Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-25T14:59:32.745Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T17:44:01.258Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-75110",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-18T12:48:39.747053Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T12:51:49.539Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/MemTensor/MemOS/issues/2259"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:pypi/MemoryOS",
          "product": "MemOS",
          "repo": "https://github.com/MemTensor/MemOS",
          "vendor": "MemTensor",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.30",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "George Chen"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "MemOS is a memory operating system for LLMs and AI agents. In deployments where authentication is enabled (AUTH_ENABLED=true) but the undocumented, defaultless INTERNAL_SERVICE_SECRET environment variable is unset, the is_internal_request() check in src/memos/api/middleware/auth.py fails open: os.getenv(\"INTERNAL_SERVICE_SECRET\") returns None and a request omitting the X-Internal-Service header also yields None, so the comparison None == None evaluates true. The request is then treated as a trusted internal principal and granted scopes: [\"all\"]. As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can reach the admin API-key management endpoints to mint API keys for any user, enumerate keys, revoke keys, and generate a master key for persistent privileged access, as well as all data endpoints."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.3,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.8,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:19:23.001Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "GitHub Issue #2259",
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MemTensor/MemOS/issues/2259"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MemTensor/MemOS"
        },
        {
          "name": "is_internal_request in src/memos/api/middleware/auth.py",
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MemTensor/MemOS/blob/main/src/memos/api/middleware/auth.py"
        },
        {
          "name": "VulnCheck Advisory: MemOS Authentication Bypass via Unset INTERNAL_SERVICE_SECRET",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/memos-authentication-bypass-via-unset-internal-service-secret"
        }
      ],
      "title": "MemOS Authentication Bypass via Unset INTERNAL_SERVICE_SECRET",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-75110",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-17T20:36:04.095Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-17T17:28:41.677Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:19:23.001Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-73309",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:01:33.140807Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-09T16:01:46.890Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "XenForo",
          "vendor": "XenForo",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.3.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:xenforo:xenforo:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "2.3.13",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Marco Paciaroni (BomboBombone)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "VulnCheck"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the OAuth2 token endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid token pairs by submitting empty values for client_secret and code_verifier parameters. Attackers can exploit PHP truthy evaluation logic, which treats empty strings as false and skips client secret validation and PKCE code verifier validation, to exchange a valid authorization code for a token pair without proving client identity or holding the PKCE commitment."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.1,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-01T15:20:31.394Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Vendor Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://xenforo.com/community/threads/security-fixes-released-for-all-xenforo-and-media-gallery-versions-2-2-0-2-3-12.239856/"
        },
        {
          "name": "Release Notes",
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://xenforo.com/community/threads/xenforo-2-3-13-and-add-ons-released-includes-security-fixes.239857/"
        },
        {
          "name": "Researcher Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://bombobombone.github.io/posts/cve-2026-73309/"
        },
        {
          "name": "Researcher PoC",
          "tags": [
            "exploit"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/BomboBombone/CVE-2026-73309"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/xenforo-authentication-bypass-via-oauth2-token-endpoint"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "XenForo \u003c 2.3.13 Authentication Bypass via OAuth2 Token Endpoint",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "vulncheck"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-73309",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-08T13:15:50.743Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-11T19:56:20.006Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-01T15:20:31.394Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-73258",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-20T18:32:20.304577Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T18:32:51.938Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/security/advisories/GHSA-cc55-8v3r-59p8"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "mongoose",
          "vendor": "cesanta",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 7.22"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Mongoose is an embedded web server and network library. Prior to 7.22, a remote attacker can place a lone carriage return or line feed in multipart input processed by mg_http_next_multipart() in src/http.c. The loops comparing s[b] and s[b + 1], and s[h2] and s[h2 + 1], use an incorrect AND condition and stop when either character resembles part of a CRLF terminator. This truncates headers, filenames, or boundaries and can cause an application to accept dangerous content after seeing a misleading Content-Type value. This issue is fixed in version 7.22."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:36:39.239Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/security/advisories/GHSA-cc55-8v3r-59p8",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/security/advisories/GHSA-cc55-8v3r-59p8"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/pull/3611",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/pull/3611"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/commit/a9df523f76f43a38bd53b4232b9cfd4c16869e71",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/commit/a9df523f76f43a38bd53b4232b9cfd4c16869e71"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/releases/tag/7.22",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose/releases/tag/7.22"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-cc55-8v3r-59p8",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Mongoose: Multipart boundary/header scan logic error in mg_http_next_multipart"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-73258",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-20T17:36:39.239Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-11T17:18:01.598Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T18:32:51.938Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-71892",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-10-05T16:58:15.636238Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T16:58:40.411Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java/",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "pkix"
          ],
          "packageName": "bcpkix",
          "packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpkix-jdk18on",
          "platforms": [
            "all"
          ],
          "product": "BC-JAVA",
          "programFiles": [
            "JceKeyTransRecipient"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java",
          "vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.86",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.78",
              "versionType": "maven"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java-fips/",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "bcpkix-fips",
          "packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpkix-fips",
          "platforms": [
            "all"
          ],
          "product": "BC-FJA",
          "vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.0.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.0.7",
              "versionType": "maven"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "2.1.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.1.0",
              "versionType": "maven"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Yu Bao from the PayPal Cyber Security Team"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the opt-in key-size validation on CMS key-transport recipients, org.bouncycastle.cms.jcajce.JceKeyTransRecipient.setKeySizeValidation(true), never ran for a message using RFC 9709 content-encryption key derivation (id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256). The branch that should have selected the actual content-encryption algorithm carried in the key derivation AlgorithmIdentifier\u0027s parameters compared the encrypted-key byte array against the id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256 object identifier, a comparison between a byte array and an ASN1ObjectIdentifier that is false for every possible input, so the check fell through to a key-size lookup on the outer wrapper OID. That OID identifies a key-derivation construction rather than a cipher and has no registered key size, so the size comparison was skipped entirely. A key-transport EnvelopedData or AuthEnvelopedData whose transported, HKDF-derived content-encryption key did not match the key size of the advertised content-encryption algorithm was therefore accepted even with validation explicitly enabled, silently defeating the only mechanism the API offers for enforcing recovered key size. The recipient now dispatches on the content-encryption AlgorithmIdentifier\u0027s algorithm OID, so validation checks the recovered key against the inner content-encryption algorithm. Messages with a matching key size, non-HKDF messages, and recipients that do not enable validation are unaffected. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the opt-in key-size validation on CMS key-transport recipients, org.bouncycastle.cms.jcajce.JceKeyTransRecipient.setKeySizeValidation(true), never ran for a message using RFC 9709 content-encryption key derivation (id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256). The branch that should have selected the actual content-encryption algorithm carried in the key derivation AlgorithmIdentifier\u0027s parameters compared the encrypted-key byte array against the id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256 object identifier, a comparison between a byte array and an ASN1ObjectIdentifier that is false for every possible input, so the check fell through to a key-size lookup on the outer wrapper OID. That OID identifies a key-derivation construction rather than a cipher and has no registered key size, so the size comparison was skipped entirely. A key-transport EnvelopedData or AuthEnvelopedData whose transported, HKDF-derived content-encryption key did not match the key size of the advertised content-encryption algorithm was therefore accepted even with validation explicitly enabled, silently defeating the only mechanism the API offers for enforcing recovered key size. The recipient now dispatches on the content-encryption AlgorithmIdentifier\u0027s algorithm OID, so validation checks the recovered key against the inner content-encryption algorithm. Messages with a matching key size, non-HKDF messages, and recipients that do not enable validation are unaffected. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series)."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "AMBER",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Amber",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697 Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-03T08:30:26.982Z",
        "orgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
        "shortName": "bcorg"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%9071892"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/be0a7d925c818ef2f338bcec55178b9b6336dfc3"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "CMS key-transport recipient key-size validation never runs for RFC 9709 HKDF-derived keys",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "bc release-notes template"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
    "assignerShortName": "bcorg",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-71892",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-03T08:30:26.982Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-08T00:06:07.401Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T16:58:40.411Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-71855",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T19:22:03.750556Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T19:22:13.492Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "suricata",
          "vendor": "OISF",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.0.6"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 7.0.17"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.17 and 8.0.6, src/flow-hash.c can treat an IPv4 and IPv6 flow as equal without comparing the IP family when their raw address words, ports, protocol, VLAN, recursion level, live device, and hash bucket align. An IPv6 packet can therefore reuse IPv4 flow state or the reverse, causing incorrect flowbit state, detection bypass, or IP-only bypass. This issue is fixed in versions 8.0.6 and 7.0.17."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-18T20:25:58.646Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-fvwh-wjcq-2586",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-fvwh-wjcq-2586"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/181b3b2fdd1fe87e4534de4fc79e29a083ef125f",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/181b3b2fdd1fe87e4534de4fc79e29a083ef125f"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/4e2f23d031fbcfd72883bacd3d723c9874f23701",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/4e2f23d031fbcfd72883bacd3d723c9874f23701"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/bc41dcc854e24487d3786ce578a8a86a8350ab20",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/bc41dcc854e24487d3786ce578a8a86a8350ab20"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-7.0.17",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-7.0.17"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.6",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.6"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8558",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8558"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-fvwh-wjcq-2586",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Suricata flow: IPv4/IPv6 hash collision can reuse wrong flow state"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-71855",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-18T20:25:58.646Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-07T18:26:53.523Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T19:22:13.492Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}